Now on ScienceBlogs: Great Plains Emerging Diseases Conference

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


profile_laden_top.jpg

If you must read only a few things today, please select from the following:

"Excuse me, there's some food in my bugs!", an exploration of human eating insects instead of the other way 'round. Also check out this related PODCAST.

You've heard the news, now find out what the scientists haven't told you because it is kinda hard to 'splain: What Happened to Our Beloved Archaeopteryx?

Why do mainstream newspapers still publish anti-evolution crank mail? Because you have not told them to refrain. Click the link and join the movement.
Congo_sidebar.jpg
An archaeological expedition to the Congo

linux_penguin.jpg
Linux

Nature Blog Network

Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

The Skeptical Search Engine

This search engine will only give you results from carefully selected skeptical and scientific sites.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« Do you think references to God on U.S. currency and in the Pledge of Allegiance violate the constitutional separation of church and state? | Main | The 'Plastiki' Expedition »

Court rules against vaccine-autism claims

Posted on: March 13, 2010 12:17 PM, by Greg Laden

Vaccines that contain a mercury-based preservative called thimerosal cannot cause autism on their own, a special U.S. court ruled on Friday, dealing one more blow to parents seeking to blame vaccines for their children's illness.

story

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133578

Comments

1

Another step for rational, science-based thought.

Appeals are in the works.

Posted by: MikeMa | March 13, 2010 4:53 PM

2

While I am smugly pleased, courts are no place to decide science. Creationists use courts to change the teaching of evolution because they can't change the science. Similarly, I don't place too much importance in this other than P.R. Which is mighty important for lay people.

Posted by: Phil | March 13, 2010 5:27 PM

3

It's not really the verdict that's important for P.R.; a lot of important findings came out during the trial. It's an excellent uh, teaching opportunity?

Posted by: Doazic | March 13, 2010 8:54 PM

4

The "on their own" may be misleading though: absolutely never, though not philosophically correct, is probably correct. I guess the honest answer is "mercury is not established to have cause autism in any case investigated to date".

Posted by: MadScientist | March 14, 2010 2:53 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.