This is very interesting. Have a look at the PDF, I'd love your opinion.
Hat tip: Chuck Todd.
Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets
Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff
Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.
Looking for stuff about birds?
Lean more about lions
An archaeological expedition to the Congo
The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.
Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.
« Oscar Post-Game | Main | Feeling Sorry For Myself Therapy: An update on my knee »
Posted on: March 8, 2010 4:15 PM, by Greg Laden
This is very interesting. Have a look at the PDF, I'd love your opinion.
Hat tip: Chuck Todd.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133261
denialism blog 02.14.2012
respectful insolence 02.14.2012
uncertain principles 02.13.2012
confessions of a science librarian 02.13.2012
starts with a bang! 02.13.2012
Comments
I see a few interesting things in here. The press seems to want to blame Obama for the disillusionment among the electorate, but the likely drop-off voters approve of the job he's doing (in general and on basically every issue but Iraq) and are generally warmer toward him than the likely voters.
They also tend to be more negative about institutions but more positive about how individual issues are being handled. They're generally more liberal/progressive, but the wording of some of the questions seems to have confused them, or at least they gave less progressive answers in some unexpected places. They have lower education overall, perhaps because of age. They are younger and less engaged in general.
Overall, I'd say we're looking at a group of people who don't want to have to work at politics, who want a vote every couple of years to make all the difference they need to make.
Posted by: Stephanie Z | March 8, 2010 8:15 PM
Wait, what? This is just a boring poll. I thought it had to do with how we were going to stock and run the FEMA camps.
Mostly I'm with Stephanie on this - there seems to be a kind of uninformed malaise reflected (I could be projecting the malaise). Too many people seem to subscribe to the fallacy of the golden mean - or perhaps I should coin a variation on that: if I said "fallacy of antipodean repulsion" would you know what I meant?
Posted by: Uncle Glenny | March 9, 2010 2:53 PM