Now on ScienceBlogs: HeartlandGate: Anti-Science Institute's Insider Reveals Secrets

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Greg Laden's Blog

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science Education, Human Evolution, and Stuff

Darwing_Face.jpg Learn more about Charles Darwin and his work.

Hornbill170.jpg Looking for stuff about birds?

Lion_mane170.jpg Lean more about lions

Congo_sidebar.jpg An archaeological expedition to the Congo


The Skeptical Search Engine


Nature Blog Network
Climate Defense Fund


The contents of Greg Laden's Blog are copyrighted by Greg Laden.

Recent Comments

Search

Profile


Click on "About" for the big picture, and "Archives" for the details.


Recent Posts

Blogroll

If you don't see yourself on my blogroll, just drop me a line and let me know. I'll add you.*
*Assuming that I'm on your blogroll, of course!

Archives

« How Thalidomide causes birth defects | Main | Westboro Church Pwned »

Texas Approves Right Wing Curriculum Revisions

Category: Education
Posted on: March 12, 2010 9:05 PM, by Greg Laden

After three days of turbulent meetings, the Texas Board of Education on Friday approved a social studies curriculum that will put a conservative stamp on history and economics textbooks, stressing the superiority of American capitalism, questioning the Founding Fathers' commitment to a purely secular government and presenting Republican political philosophies in a more positive light.

NYT

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Education

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/133561

Comments

1

These same publishers sell college level textbooks. There are probably more textbooks sold by these publishers at a college level than at a grade and high school level. As college professors, scientists, researchers and college students, we should have a greater influence on the publishers than 11 idiots in Texas. We really need a list of all the textbook publishers who give in and rewrite history and promote anti-scientific ideas and boycott them.

Posted by: Mxh | March 12, 2010 10:50 PM

2

Holy shit. Revisionist history now? We *really* have to move towards electronic book made up by experts in their fields and forget about the publishers. Remember, the publishers have one thing and one thing only in mind: MONEY. Texas has a lot of it set aside for books and the cuckoos figured out over 30 years ago that they can use that to their advantage by pushing shit in Texas schools and other states will more or less be forced to use the same shitty books. Here's another clue: the other states should declare a moratorium on buying new books - the only problem with that is how do you replace the numerous damaged books ... Anyway, a broad moratorium by most other states would send the publishers an economic signal saying "we don't want your shit".

Posted by: MadScientist | March 13, 2010 2:05 AM

3

I kinda sympathize with Dr. Leroy motivation, though - it's a matter of adding balance. Since reality has a well-known liberal bias, we should balance that with a conservative bias in the history books - think of it as a kind of consolation prize. (Seriously, though, I'd wish they'd one day realize the reason for the lack of "great conservatives" in history books: with a century or more of hindsight, "managed to delay inevitable progress by twenty years" usually doesn't appear as that much of an achievement anymore.)

At the end of the day, I think the publishers should try to submit unchanged text books and just claim they made the required changes. I highly doubt any of the Republican members of the Texas BOE can actually read, so they'll likely never notice.

Posted by: Phillip IV | March 13, 2010 5:09 AM

4

That drastic and damaging changes like this are labeled with the sensible-sounding word, conservative, continues to baffle me. Wouldn't it be more conservative to not want to change the existing textbooks? Wouldn't it be more conservative to keep social studies textbooks focused more on facts and less on ideology and a mythologizing patriotism? But the US political meaning of conservative is different from the standard, non-political adjective meaning, I guess.

Posted by: deang | March 13, 2010 11:34 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.