Posted by Comments
-
Very well said.
-
I’d feel better without this sort of rhetoric being thrown around. It isn’t helpful when it comes from either end of the political spectrum. (That said, Maher actually seemed a bit restrained compared to the headline. In the context of what he said he was simply using a fairly poor analogy.) But seriously, this is very similar to the sort of rhetoric that leads to violence from the right. We don’t need it.
-
Is it rhetoric from the left that “leads to” violence from the right?
-
Joshua, I assume you are using the term “rhetoric” to mean “bullshit” as opposed to just … well, “rhetoric.” In which case, I call bullshit. The fact that republicans are a deadly enemy entitles the use of the phrase. Their fault, not mine, not Mahers.
Don’t make me use a Nazi analogy!@!!!#
-
Now Maher is trying to piss off the Pastafarians.
AArrgh!! is one of their sacred words if not mistaken. -
I have a Nazi analogy! We executed the Nazi leadership at Nuremberg for the supreme international war crime of aggression against a sovereign country. The fact that the Nazis excused their actions as liberating Poland and France from the Jews, a preemptive attack for German security, and a patriotic and economic necessity didn’t mitigate their crime. So why aren’t Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al six feet under already? Could it be a little Christian hypocrisy?
October 3, 2010
October 3, 2010
October 3, 2010
October 3, 2010
October 4, 2010
October 5, 2010
, which is now available for the 
