The Friend of Darwin Award, also known as the Chucky, honors NCSE members for outstanding effort to support NCSE and its goals. Here’s what it looks like.

Friend of Darwin award.preview.jpg

And this year’s award goes to ….

i-c98770b69576a50e9d440d27947d6604-Niles_Darwin-thumb-500x332-62947.jpg

Niles Eldredge!!! Congratulations Niles.

From the NCSE:

Niles Eldredge has been making the case for evolution–explaining, defending, and expanding the scientific account of the history of life–for over 40 years.

A breakthrough researcher who formulated the idea of punctuated equilibria with Stephen Jay Gould, Eldredge has been an evolution advocate and communicator without peer. Eldredge has lectured extensively and written over 200 articles and 22 books, including The Monkey Business: A Scientist Looks at Creationism, The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism, and Darwin: Discovering the Tree of Life. And he is the founding co-editor-in-chief of Evolution: Education & Outreach, a journal that promotes accurate understanding and comprehensive teaching of evolutionary theory for a wide audience.

As curator and research paleontologist of Department of Invertebrate Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History since 1969, Eldredge has led the way in expanding the public’s knowledge of evolution, organizing the museum’s acclaimed exhibit celebrating the bicentennial of Darwin’s birth and the sesquicentennial of the publication of On the Origin of Species.

But it was Eldredge and Gould’s breakthrough theory of punctuated equilibria that turned evolution on its ear. And it was all inspired by Eldredge’s passion for trilobites.

“As a PhD candidate, I set out to collect trilobite fossils from all over the Midwest. And I started to realize that the fossils I was collecting–whatever point in time I was in–all looked the same. I found no evidence of change. At first I put that down to my inexperience…’I’m not good enough to see the obvious changes that are here.’”

Eventually, Eldredge and Gould realized that the earlier, simplistic notion of gradual change over time wasn’t always reflected in the fossil record. In fact, claimed the duo, stasis for eons is the norm, “punctuated” by brief periods of rapid evolutionary change. While Darwin had recognized this pattern, Eldredge and Gould put the flesh on the bones.

“I’ve spent most of my life arguing with Darwin…some of the larger scale patterns [in evolution] were being swept under the rug” says Eldredge. “Punctuated equilibrium was our attempt to get some of these empirical things back into the mix.”

What makes Eldredge a fitting candidate for the Friend of Darwin award? NCSE Executive Director Genie Scott sums it up: “Niles was there before there was an NCSE and he has never flagged in his support for NCSE over the many decades. Just as important: Niles has been a devoted advocate for evolution education and for keeping the creationists out of the science class, via his work at the AMNH, his writings, his years of service at the New York Committee for Science Education, and his leadership in
establishing and editing Evolution: Education and Outreach.”

Evolutionist par excellence, scourge of creationists, lover of trilobites, and longtime ally of NCSE, Dr. Eldredge is indeed a mighty Friend of Darwin.

Soon to be a major motion picture:

Comments

  1. #1 brainwashedevolutionist
    March 22, 2011

    Darwinian evolution equals imagination while science equals reasoning. Facts are things that can be proven. Pretty drawings and fancy guesswork are products of a great imagination.

  2. #2 Mike Haubrich
    March 22, 2011

    bwe: What sort of science do you find to provide superior answers to the persistent questions of evolution? (Drop the “darwinian” as the understanding of evolution has grown a bit since Darwin.)

  3. #3 Shadeburst
    March 22, 2011

    I’d be interested in knowing the skeptic attitude (I’d like to be a skeptic but I’m too gullible) towards panspermia such as described in “The Biological Big Bang: Panspermia and the Origins of Life” to which Chandra Wickramasinghe has contributed. Their claim being that Darwinism is dead because all “evolutionary” changes were due to meteor and comet impacts bringing new life forms. (Hell I’m trying to give their argument a fair presentation but the logic is far less transparent than quantum chromodynamics.) Inform me anyone?

  4. The origin of life has almost nothing to do with “Darwinism” and panspermia is not a falsification of evolution, even if true.