The first crane and the last crane

The first crane I ever saw is a bird burned permanently in my memory. It came out of nowhere and flew close by, staying in view lit by a nearly setting sun for about five wing beats. A gun was raised to shoot it but the trigger was not pulled.

I was a teenager, and the brother of a co-worker invited me to go hunting with him. The idea was not for me to actually hunt, but rather, for me to see what hunting was all about. It was a social gesture and a manly gesture. If I like hunting perhaps I would join one of their hunting groups, get a firearm, learn to shoot, and become one of the boys. I went along out of curiosity, not yet knowing that I would later devote a significant part of my life to the study of hunting (and gathering) as a way of life, though sensing (correctly) that I would never be a hunter in the US. I had spent by that age enormous amounts of time alone in the wilderness, and that sense of intentional loneliness and studied solitude was occasionally, though rarely, broken by the sound of gunfire. More to the point, though, there were many weeks of the year when my forays into the mountains could not happen because the hunters had taken over the woods. Also, I knew that my own efforts to get close to wildlife (physically close, that is) were thwarted by their skittishness which, in turn, resulted form their being blasted at by my fellow humans. So I wasn’t anti-hunting (any more … as a younger kid I was very much so) but hunting annoyed me. So I didn’t see myself doing it any more than I saw myself engaging in the other activity that ruined the wild mountains near where I grew up (downhill skiing).

But I went anyway. Curiosity.

Our quarry was the elusive and tasty woodcock. I find it funny that hunters, prone to dick jokes, hunt this particular bird. And not only do they shoot the woodcock but later they eat it. But I digress.

We were after woodcock, which is a tiny woodland bird with long beak and an overall sandpiper-like body. We went down to an island on the Hudson River where there was both good woodcock habitat and good duck habitat. The idea was this: We’d check out the duck habitat, observe the ducks, figure out where a good place to shoot the ducks from might be, work out the approach to the duck-spot, and so on, and while we were there if any woodcock dared to spring into view as they tend to so late in the afternoon, the hour before sunset, we’d blast them. And later, eat them. In a non sexual way, of course. Meanwhile, the intelligence gathered regarding the ducks would be used by my hunting companion during duck hunting season, which as I understood it was coming up.

It was on this trip to the river-island, by the way, that I learned that duck hunters are not allowed to shoot the duck while it is in the water. You have to wait until it flies into the air. That told me quite a bit about what bird hunting entails … it is as much, or more, about shooting as it is about hunting. I also suddenly realized the meaning of the term “sitting duck.” Prior to that I had not thought about it much.

So we checked out the duck habitat, and wandered back and forth among the clearing and brushy woods and water spots, mostly quietly, when suddenly we saw the crane. I had never seen a crane before. It came out of nowhere, and in just a few long and slow wing beats traversed the open sky and disappeared beyond the treeline. The moment the bird came to view my companion raised his shotgun and threw the cocking mechanism and safety. By the third wing beat he clearly had a bead on the bird. He kept his aim steady as the bird flew out of sight, but he never pulled the trigger.

“What was that?” I asked.

“I dunno. But I’m pretty sure it’s not in season.”

“That why you didn’t shoot it?”

“I guess.”

I was impressed that he was able to raise the gun and not fire it. That was good. That meant that if there was some endangered species flying around among non-endangered species that were being hunted, a hunter, with skill, could avoid shooting the endangered ones and only shoot the non-endangered one. I wondered if all hunters were this skilled. Or not.

Then, moments, even seconds, later, something else flew into view and he raised his shotgun and fired.

BAM!!!

And a thing came reeling down out of the sky landing pretty close to us.

“Woodcock!” he yelled. I was impressed that he was able to spot the bird and fire so quickly and actually hit the thing. Yes, yes, this sport was about shooting more than anything else.

So we walked over to it and as we got close I could see it still moving, either not quite dead or twitching from nerves. And as we got close enough I could see that it was not a woodcock. It wasn’t even a bird. It was a bat, trying to crawl away using its wings. The hunter stepped on it and killed it.

“Oh well,” he said.

I was no longer impressed.

_________________________

Stop the Kentucky Sandhill Crane hunt. Click here for more information.

i-af727314bb91def34a44e4261c14ccca-PleaseClickOnThisStuff.jpg

Comments

  1. #1 AK
    July 18, 2011

    I don’t see why people shouldn’t be allowed to hunt cranes… as long as they use bow and (unpoisoned) arrow.

    If you want to shoot something, install a 1PShooter game on your PC.

  2. #2 Russell
    July 18, 2011

    Nice post. I feel much the same way about hunting. When I’m in the field, there’s more I want to observe and enjoy than hunting would allow. Despite some tries when young, I never acquired the thrill of the hunt.

    But I do enjoy shooting.

  3. #3 Jim Thomerson
    July 18, 2011

    Disclaimer–I have never hunted ducks. The duck’s best friend carries a shotgun. The only natural bottom land along the Illinois River is duck hunting club land. Part of it is unhunted duck refuge, because supplying such means more ducks to hunt. Federal and state wildlife refuges are paid for from hunting licenses, duck stamps, etc. Ducks unlimited looks out for ducks.

    The point is that if an animal legal for sport hunting, its kill gets regulated, it is managed to do well, and a group of hunters who want it available to hunt are its friends. They are concerned that it has habitat, that it is not over hunted, or decimated in some other way.

    Looking at duck hunting regulations, it is clear that a legal hunter has to be very good at duck identification because the laws say so many of those, and so many of these, and none of them.

  4. #4 peter
    July 18, 2011

    “So I didn’t see myself doing it any more than I saw myself engaging in the other activity that ruined the wild mountains near where I grew up (downhill skiing).”

    I wasn’t aware that hunting kills trees or destabilizes hillsides. Must be something I am doing wrong when out tracking moose or deer.
    It is usually the hunters who have an interest not to have their hunting areas destroyed by resource extraction or industrial development.

  5. #5 Iain
    July 19, 2011

    Hi, I love the sound of the Cranes as they arrive back in northern Sweden each late Spring/Summer to breed. And ditto, the return leg South in Fall. Always a great sight to see them wheeling around, or tottering around in the garden up there! I was in France many years ago, sitting on the terrace with a glass of wine when, ‘Bam’, and a beautiful, innocuous song thrush landed dead, splattered and splintered at my feet. No time for that kind of callous hunting at all. Hunting when needed for the belly is one thing, hunting for the pleasure of killing delightful wildlife is quite another.

  6. #6 Jesse
    July 19, 2011

    @peter– I think he was speaking of the noise of the guns and other secondary effects.

    Other than that, while I have no particular problem with hunting per se I am one of those who remembers all too well the species that didn’t survive hunting. Sea cows, for instance, and whales. Passenger pigeons. And some that were and are endangered as a result. I understand there is a difference between modern sport hunting and resource-extraction hunting, and that habitat loss and such play a role. But I’d say the record of sport hunters on species is a bit of a mixed bag.

    Part of the problem is that the criteria for a human hunter are different from that of a predator. As a human deer hunter I want a 12-point buck. As a wolf pack hunting deer (or any other herding herbivore) I am not going for the trophy animal but the one I can catch. Big difference. This creates very different pressures on the animals.

  7. #7 Greg Laden
    July 19, 2011

    peter, don’t be so defensive. I’m all for hunting. If you read all the words in the post, like the ones just before and after and stuff, you’ll see that I was annoyed as a teenager that hunting drove me out of my favorite forests during certain times of the year. Hunters take over the woods during hunting season, skii resorts rip down giant swaths of trees and replace them with snow bunnies.

    I don’t subscribe at all to the idea that it is ok for hunters to get annoyed at everyone else but they must always be given a pass. They are smelly, loud, orange troglodytes who think they own the woods. And some of my best friends are hunters. I’m pretty sure there’s one in my bathroom at the moment.

Current ye@r *