At three minutes and four seconds after 2 AM on the 6th of May this year, the time and date will be 02:03:04 05/06/07. This will never happen again.
Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)
Written by an evolutionary biologist/ornithologist who writes about E3 -- Evolution, Ecology and Ethology -- and the subtle relationships between these phenomena, especially in birds.
GrrlScientist Tweets:
GrrlScientist's New Blog:
Search This Blog
Valuable Information
Concisus Vitae
GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who loves to write about "E3": evolution, ethology and ecology and the subtle relationships between these fields, especially in birds.
GrrlScientist's new blog can be accessed through any one of these five domain names: GrrlScientist.net, grrlscientist.org, grrlscientist.info, grrlscientist.com, or grrlscientist.us (keep in mind that, in the future, these domains may point to different places). GrrlScientist's current blog home is at her NATURE Network blog, Maniraptora.
Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Kolibri Expeditions, ScienceOnline09, Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs. More biographical information about GrrlScientist.
Follow GrrlScientist:
GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed at his site, Hero Machine.
Recent Posts
- Big News: This Blog Has Migrated to a New Home
- ScienceBlogs = ZombieBlogs
- Mystery Bird: Magnificent Frigatebird, Fregata magnificens
- Scientia Pro Publica (Science for the People) #35 is Published!
- The Secret Powers of Time
- A Rocket of His Own
- Rosa Blume unter Goldenen Blumen
- SMG/Sb Ethical Lapse Claims Another 'SciBling'
- Mystery Bird: Reddish Egret, Egretta rufescens
- Zircons: Time Capsules from the Early Earth
Recent Comments
- Robert on Goodbye: Dusky Seaside Sparrow
- mackerelsaladboy on TEDTalks: Matt Ridley: When Ideas Have Sex
- mackerelsaladboy on ScienceBlogs = ZombieBlogs
- Leon Shernoff on Stinkhorn Mushroom
- Funny about Money on ScienceBlogs = ZombieBlogs
- Daniel Eichenbaum on ScienceBlogs = ZombieBlogs
- Murray on Mystery Bird: Gray Wren-warbler, Calamonastes simplex, and Lesser Striped Swallow, Hirundo abyssinica
- Paul on Update on The Homeless Telegraph Hill Parrots of San Francisco
- Daniel J. Andrews on ScienceBlogs = ZombieBlogs
- Sean on A Rocket of His Own
$upport This Scholar
Worthy Causes to $upport
Meters and Counters
- September 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
Archives
Deep archives
Rotating Drinking Pals
Rotating Reciprocal Links
Reading/Reviewing
Blog Essay Publications
Book Contributions
Bookmarking/Networking
My Little Radio Station (Music)
News and Talk
Miscellaneous
« Spider Venom Cures Male Impotence | Main | Mess O' Potomac »
Date Weirdness
Topic Categories:
Posted on: May 5, 2007 8:59 AM, by "GrrlScientist"
































Comments
And if you read the clock in military or European ways, it will happen at three minutes and four seconds after 2 AM on the 5th of June.
Posted by: G in INdiana | May 5, 2007 9:09 AM
That will be Julian day 2454226.585463, an instant in time that will never be repeated, not ever, even unto the end of time.
As a matter of fact, EVERY Julian day value is unique and will never recur.
The 2-3-4-5-6-7 sequence is simply an artifact of the particular denomination of time. Do it in octal or hexadecimal, and you'll have similar results but at different times.
Isn't this a bit silly?
Posted by: Graying Grouch | May 5, 2007 9:51 AM
Oh great, we have to wait another month for this. :-(
Bob
Posted by: Bob O'H | May 5, 2007 10:04 AM
Never happen again?
This would only be true if you expect the universe to end in less than one century ;-). There may even be a reader who will still be alive in 2107.
Posted by: Paul Hutchinson | May 5, 2007 10:29 AM
And if you go to Japan you just have to wait until the seventh year of the next emperors reign (you use the date of the reign along with western months, days and times).
Posted by: Janne | May 5, 2007 11:25 AM
Yeah, and one year and one month and one day and one hour and one minute and one second before that it was 01:02:03 04/05/06. So what.
Posted by: Karl | May 5, 2007 1:30 PM
In other, more civilized countries, the date is not listed in the nonsensical manner of month/day/year; it is listed as highest resolution to lowest resolution, or vice versa. E.g. the date you mention would be 06/05/07 or 07/05/06. I prefer the latter convention, year, month, day, because when i use this to names computer files, an alphanumeric sorting turns out the same as a chronological sorting.
Posted by: Mustafa Mond, FCD | May 5, 2007 8:07 PM
I always thought that the dating convention reflected how people spoke.
In English speaking countries people normally say the date Day/Month/Year (6th May, 2007) whilst in those that speak American they normally say the date as Month/Day/Year (May 6th, 2007); here, in Saudi, they normally give the date in the Day/Month/Year format even though they mostly speak American as that is how it is said in Arabic. Oh yes it is the year 1428 here.
I also use your Year/Month/Day format on files, makes for an easier life and it is how I was taught all those years ago, but I don't forsee it catching on in normal speech.
Posted by: Chris' Wills | May 6, 2007 1:13 AM
It is actually 2007-05-06 in the more civilized countries ;)
(See ISO 8601.)
Posted by: Peter Lund | May 6, 2007 10:15 AM
Using the convention assumed, in addition to having happened in 1907, 1807, ... and will happen again in 2107, 2207, ..., it also happened 24 or so times on the day, once in each (notational) time zone. (There are more zones then the notational 24, so it happens more than 24 times.) Martians and other calendars also challenge the "uniqueness" of the many moments.
Posted by: blf | May 6, 2007 12:48 PM
Does any country actually use this convention in day to day correspondence and/or speech or is no-one more civilised?
Posted by: Chris' Wills | May 6, 2007 1:27 PM