Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

Written by an evolutionary biologist/ornithologist who writes about E3 -- Evolution, Ecology and Ethology -- and the subtle relationships between these phenomena, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist Tweets:

GrrlScientist's New Blog:

Search This Blog

Valuable Information

Concisus Vitae

GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who loves to write about "E3": evolution, ethology and ecology and the subtle relationships between these fields, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist's new blog can be accessed through any one of these five domain names: GrrlScientist.net, grrlscientist.org, grrlscientist.info, grrlscientist.com, or grrlscientist.us (keep in mind that, in the future, these domains may point to different places). GrrlScientist's current blog home is at her NATURE Network blog, Maniraptora.

Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Kolibri Expeditions, ScienceOnline09, Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs. More biographical information about GrrlScientist.

Follow GrrlScientist:

GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed at his site, Hero Machine.





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

$upport This Scholar

Worthy Causes to $upport

Meters and Counters

« Old Wives | Main | Birdie Blog Carnival Available »

Paralyzed Mice Walk Again

Topic Categories: Medicine
Posted on: May 3, 2007 4:06 PM, by "GrrlScientist"

tags: , ,


A group of lab mice were intentionally paralyzed by cutting their spinal cords. As a result, they ended up dragging their hind legs behind them instead of scurrying around as mice do. But a group of these mice have partially recovered movement in their hind legs without the aid of surgery or drugs, thanks to a new field of medical research known as regenerative medicine.

Samuel Stupp and his colleagues are several of the pioneers in the field regenerative medicine, and they have developed a liquid that is injected into the severed spines of these mice that restores their ability to move within six weeks. This liquid contains nanostructures filled with tiny designer molecules that were developed by Stupp and his colleagues at Northwestern University.

If this research works as well in humans as it does in mice, it will considerably brighten the future of those who suffer from Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, as well as those who have survived spinal cord injuries.

"It's just the very beginning, so this is extremely early," said Stupp. "We are introducing these nanostructures in the brain of mice that have Parkinson's disease. We have seen very interesting functional recovery."

When a spinal cord is severed, glial cells create a "glial scar" that prevents the spinal cord from healing itself. This process takes only a few weeks. However, the experimental mice in Stupp's lab can move because Stupp's injected designer molecules prevented the formation of a glial scar.

Stupp's team discovered a special biological signal that encourages stem cells in the body that have not yet developed into specialized cells to differentiate into new neurons, thus making regeneration possible. This same molecular signal triggers the growing neurons to send out axons; fibers that extend out from these cells to attach to other cells, thus allowing the brain to regain control of the body's movements and functions, such as moving the legs.

"We see regenerated axons across the lesion," Stupp said. "That's the exciting part. Regeneration of axons across the lesion is very significant."

Unless encouraged to develop into neurons, these stem cells instead differentiate into glial cells, thus making recovery much more difficult by reinforcing the spinal blockage.

But what happens to the nanostructures after they have done their work? Will they remain behind, causing havoc in the body?

"These nanostructures are completely biodegradable," Stupp said. "They disappear within weeks."

But Stupp and his colleagues' work might be only part of the solution. They might find that nanostructures make great drug delivery systems, but certain medical solutions may require the introduction of stem cells, so that controversy isn't likely to go away. But perhaps a combination of nanotechnology and traditional medical procedures might be just what the doctor ordered.


Cited story.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

It's hard not to get bogged down as cynicism from all sorts of places influences our outlook. Then something like this comes up as a reminder that the world has a lot of really good people doing some amazing things.

Posted by: Theodore Wilson | May 3, 2007 4:55 PM

2

Here's the compliment as promised: Great post! Very interesting stuff.

It sounds like this approach would only help people with very recent spinal cord injuries, since this technique stops the glial scar from growing, but would not remove an existing one. Is that correct?

Posted by: Mike | May 4, 2007 9:53 AM

3

thanks for the positive feedback, especially you, Mike (i was waiting for a comment from you and was getting ready to post a few political diatribes to increase my blog traffic, which is now 1/4th of what it was while i posted daily political diatribes).

my understanding of this process is that the severed spinal cord must be repaired fairly quickly after the event or the glial scar forms, preventing it from repairing itself at all.

Posted by: "GrrlScientist" | May 4, 2007 2:43 PM

4

Hmmm. They need to market this properly:

See the effect of our new patent oil! Here we have six paralysed mice - none of which can walk. Now we apply the oil and wait

....

And ... they can now walk perfectly!

Now, you can have your own bottle of Stupp's NewGrowth OilTM, for only $19.99 (plus postage and packing). Get it now while stocks last!

Stupp's NewGrowth OilTM: it's a miracle!

Posted by: Bob O'H | May 4, 2007 3:47 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.