Now on ScienceBlogs: The significance of 2/13

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

Written by an evolutionary biologist/ornithologist who writes about E3 -- Evolution, Ecology and Ethology -- and the subtle relationships between these phenomena, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist Tweets:

GrrlScientist's New Blog:

Search This Blog

Valuable Information

Concisus Vitae

GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who loves to write about "E3": evolution, ethology and ecology and the subtle relationships between these fields, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist's new blog can be accessed through any one of these five domain names: GrrlScientist.net, grrlscientist.org, grrlscientist.info, grrlscientist.com, or grrlscientist.us (keep in mind that, in the future, these domains may point to different places). GrrlScientist's current blog home is at her NATURE Network blog, Maniraptora.

Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Kolibri Expeditions, ScienceOnline09, Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs. More biographical information about GrrlScientist.

Follow GrrlScientist:

GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed at his site, Hero Machine.





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

$upport This Scholar

Worthy Causes to $upport

Meters and Counters

« Body Bugs: An Emerging Infection? | Main | Let's Become Terrorists for Jeebus! »

Cyborg Moths to Spy on Terrorists

Topic Categories: Insects
Posted on: June 1, 2007 4:25 PM, by "GrrlScientist"

tags: , , ,


Would you think I was talking about a science-fiction novel if I told you that scientists can control the movements of a live moth using a joystick, and this moth was being used to spy on terrorist training camps in the hills of Pakistan? Just imagine; such a moth would be able to sit in a terrorist camp without arousing suspicion, while sending video and other information back to its homebase using a "reliable tissue-machine interface." But hey, apparently, this is not the stuff of science-fiction at all. In fact, this technology is being developed now and will be used at some point in the near future.

These "cyborg moths" are created by placing computer parts into the caterpillar so their nervous system grows around the parts, allowing the computer to control the behavior of the adult moth. These cyborg-moths have been described as one of the most ambitious robotics projects ever conceived by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa), the research and development arm of the US Department of Defense (DoD).

"Moths are creatures that need little food and can fly all kinds of places," said Rod Brooks, director of the computer science and artificial intelligence lab at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). "A bunch of experiments have been done over the past couple of years where simple animals, such as rats and cockroaches, have been operated on and driven by joysticks, but this is the first time where the chip has been injected in the pupa stage and 'grown' inside it. Once the moth hatches, machine learning is used to control it."

Robotics is increasingly at the forefront of US military research, and remote-controlled moths, described by DARPA as Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems, or MEMS, are one of a number of technologies soon to be deployed in combat zones.

"This is going to happen," said Brooks. "It's not science like developing the nuclear bomb, which costs billions of dollars. It can be done relatively cheaply."

Brooks has worked on robotic technology for more than 30 years. His company, iRobot, supplies the US military with robots that defuse explosive devices placed by insurgents. Apparently, robotic technology is working out so well that the military wishes to become more reliant on such "semi-autonomous" devices, including those that could fire a weapon.

"The DoD has said it wants one third of all missions to be unmanned by 2015, and there's no doubt their things will become weaponised, so the question comes: should they given targeting authority?"


Cited story.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

Hopefully our cyborg-moth overlords will eat bush and his cronies.

Posted by: llewelly | June 1, 2007 6:01 PM

2

Quick, Henry, the Flit!

Posted by: Ktesibios | June 1, 2007 8:06 PM

3

On its face it is interesting although I think it is disgusting to use animals in this way. First bugs, then what?

I can see another problem with this, though .... people will use this as an excuse to indiscriminately kill or poision all kinds of creatures, including moths under the auspices of protecting national (and personal?)security. Fear and paranoia that could be generated or nurtured could be another kind of "bomb".

That will be the end of endangered species and lots of others. Why worry about protecting habitat of spy creatures or potential spy creatures? If you want to convince your population that creatures should be destroyed and their habitat used for parking lots, just convince them the cockroaches, rats, cats, bears, lynx, birds, bugs.... have transmitters and are spying on them. Just kill all the creatures and you don't have to worry. And you don't even have to blame yourself! You can say - if it weren't for our enemies, we would not have to destroy our wildlife and natural areas! We only have to do it because our enemy MAKES us do it with their spy bugs!

Don't believe me?

Orwell was just a few decades off.

Clapping

Chardyspal

Posted by: Chardyspal | June 1, 2007 8:59 PM

4
...there's no doubt their things will become weaponised...

They already have :-)

Bob

Posted by: Bob O'H | June 2, 2007 4:50 AM

5

The next stage is to use the moths to summon giant eagles.

Posted by: Ed Yong | June 3, 2007 1:58 PM

6

This one has been kicking around for a while. The thing to realize is that the whole point of DARPA is precisely to fund "blue sky" stuff that's too weird for the regular science foundations. Every so often they get a real hit (like the ARPAnet), but a lot of those projects just don't work out -- and I wouldn't hold my breath for this one.

On the other hand, is anyone else flashing on Danny Dunn, Invisible Boy?

Posted by: David Harmon | June 3, 2007 3:03 PM

7

How come this isn't kept secret, I wonder? Terrorists can read the Internet, too, can't they?

Posted by: Gaijin51 | June 4, 2007 12:16 AM

8

Oh, I don't know. My work is in motor neuroscience (humans, not animals) and we understand a lot about the motor system already. It wouldn't surprise me if this took off relatively soon.

After all, it's been done with flies...

Posted by: Despard | June 5, 2007 5:55 AM

9

Despard: Oh, I don't mean to imply it couldn't be done in the lab... but it's a long way from there to turning it into a useful surveillance (or weapon-delivery) system.

Posted by: David Harmon | June 5, 2007 1:58 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.