Now on ScienceBlogs: "Investigative science journalism" and books I like to read [All of My Faults Are Stress Related]

Seed Media Group

The Week In ScienceBlogs: Sign up for our newsletter.

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

"The universe is full of magical things, patiently waiting for our wits to grow sharper." -- Eden Phillpotts.

Search

Concisus Vitae

GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist, ornithologist, aviculturist, birder and freelance science and nature writer. A native of the Pacific Northwest, she relocated from Seattle to NYC with her parrots after earning a BS in Microbiology (emphasis in Virology) and PhD in Zoology (Ornithology) from the University of Washington. In NYC, she was the Chapman Postdoctoral Fellow at the American Museum of Natural History for two years, pursuing part of her "dream" research project by reconstructing a molecular phylogeny of the parrots of the South Pacific islands. GrrlScientist has written a blog about science since 4 August 2004 (the early years are archived here) and was part of the original invited group of 14 "SciBlings" -- her only claim to fame. If you appreciate GrrlScientist's writing, please help her pay her living expenses by clicking on the Paypal button below and by voting for her to be the official blogger on a month long adventure in Antarctica. If you read an essay that you especially enjoyed, please nominate it for OpenLab2009.

Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs.

GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed here.

Nominate your science, nature or medical writing to Scientia Pro Publica (Science for the Public) blog carnival using the widget above.

Meters and Counters






View blog authority

Help This $cientist-Blogger

Worthy Causes to $upport

Bookmarking/Networking

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blog Bling

Archives

Deep archives

Rotating Drinking Pals

Rotating Reciprocal Links

Reading/Viewing

Listening

I've Contributed To

Miscellaneous

« October 5th is a Very Important Day for Vertebrate Paleontologists | Main | Hirsute Leafcutter Bee »

What Kind of Reader Are You?

Topic Categories:
Posted on: October 7, 2007 10:59 AM, by "GrrlScientist"

tags: ,


What Kind of Reader Are You?
Your Result: Dedicated Reader
 

You are always trying to find the time to get back to your book. You are convinced that the world would be a much better place if only everyone read more.

Obsessive-Compulsive Bookworm
 
Literate Good Citizen
 
Book Snob
 
Fad Reader
 
Non-Reader
 
What Kind of Reader Are You?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/51829

Comments

1

I took the quiz, and it labeled me a "book snob." Pffft.

Posted by: Book Snob | October 7, 2007 12:10 PM

2

Also a dedicated reader.
I realise this quiz doesn't mean anything, but I had problems giving honest answers. E.g., whilst I tend to read only one book at a time, I'm also tend to read multiple periodicals, and the "types" are different: SF/fantasy books, but reality(/sciencey) periodicals. And at least one daily newspaper. And blogs et al. on the internet. And none of the complete sets of books Q6 mentioned. And I usually have a periodical or a newspaper with me ("in my bag") rather than a book. And ... aw, it's not worth going on ... this is just for fun.

Posted by: blf | October 7, 2007 12:59 PM

3

I couldn't take it. Too many questions had either more than one answer (which group have you read all of) or no valid choice (like what type do you read most of). With my best guesses, Obsessive-Compulsive Bookworm - but I'm not really that disturbed by "grammatical errors". Really. I'm no prescriptivist.

Posted by: The RIdger | October 7, 2007 1:09 PM

4

It had me down as a book snob. Git. I guess it heard me think "Not To The Lighthouse, but I have read Orlando and The Waves".

If anyone around here gets a non-zero score on "non-reader", I suggest they keep it quiet.

Bob

Posted by: Bob O'H | October 7, 2007 1:37 PM

5

Dedicated Reader.

The book groupings seemed a bit odd and question 7 didn't have the real answer "most anything and everything". :o)

Oh yes, question 12 forgot about the hard disk not being large enough.

Posted by: Chris' Wills | October 7, 2007 2:02 PM

6

That's right, they didn't ask anything about magazines.

I don't think anybody in Hollywood likes to read. I can't think of one movie that was better than the book.

I still remember telling my son that the reason grocery stores put magazines near the checkout line is so you'll have something to read while you wait.

It all started when my Mom put the cereal box in front of me when I was eating breakfast. Once I started reading the cereal box then I was off .....

Posted by: AnnR | October 14, 2007 8:42 AM

7

Too weird: I was looking for this quiz last night.

Still an obsessive-compulsive book worm. Woo. Thanks!

Posted by: Bachalon | October 14, 2007 3:55 PM

8

I used to be more of a book snob, but having worked in publishing, I have a much more jaundiced and cynical view of the literary world these days. At the rate I've been going lately, I expect that eventually I will end up in the "cookbooks only" category.


Posted by: Moopheus | October 14, 2007 8:58 PM

9

Another "dedicated reader" here...

Posted by: David Harmon | October 15, 2007 5:57 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM