tags: Blue House Sparrow, Passer domesticus, birds, blue feather color, plumage color, refraction
Blue-colored Male House Sparrow, Passer domesticus,
photographed in Sydney, Australia, April 2009.
Some of you might remember the remarkable photographs of the blue-colored male house sparrow, Passer domesticus, that was photographed in a garden in Sydney, Australia a couple weeks ago. I posted the images I had, along with my speculations, but was unable to go further than that. However, I tracked down the photographer and he has very kindly written back, and included more images and comments for us to speculate over.
Dear GrrlScientist (Sorry, I don’t know who you are),
Thank you for your very interesting observations about ‘my’ blue sparrow recently.
I’m a writer with London’s Daily Mail newspaper, based in Sydney, Australia, and I suppose many people would have thought ‘Oh, he’s a journalist – how come a blue sparrow happens to land in his garden?’
Well, it certainly did, and since the first pictures I managed to grab with a consumer camera, the bird has paid a return visit. Very difficult to photograph because you know what sparrows are like – blink and they’ve gone.
I’m taking the liberty of attaching three pictures for your observation (and comment, please!). [ ... ]
The first [top image] was taken last month, when the bird first visited. I’ve included the entire picture because it shows ‘ordinary’ brown sparrows below the blue bird.
Blue-colored Male House Sparrow, Passer domesticus,
photographed in Sydney, Australia, April 2009.The one on the ground [above] is a bit blurred, I’m afraid because it was taken on that first day when I had to grab the nearest camera and just fire away. But you can see how blue the bird is.
Finally, the third picture [below] of the bird with its beak open is very clear and sharp and reveals its true colours.
Blue-colored Male House Sparrow, Passer domesticus,
photographed in Sydney, Australia, April 2009.Of course, I’ve had a few cynics saying it’s not a sparrow (when it obviously is) and even a suggestion that it’s been ‘Photoshopped’. I think it’s pretty obvious that there’s been no photo manipulation (apart from slight sharpening).
I’ll be away from Sydney for a couple of weeks so I won’t be able to keep watching, but when I’m back I’ll continue to watch the bird feeder.
As a matter of fact, my wife thinks she saw a second blue sparrow flitting around recently – at the same time as the ‘first one’ was at the bird feeder. I wonder if this suggests that a mother bird has bred a unique batch of young…?
All the best,
Richard Shears


