Now on ScienceBlogs: An Experiment in Teaching Writing: A Look Inside the Sausage Factory

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

Written by an evolutionary biologist/ornithologist who writes about E3 -- Evolution, Ecology and Ethology -- and the subtle relationships between these phenomena, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist Tweets:

GrrlScientist's New Blog:

Search This Blog

Valuable Information

Concisus Vitae

GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who loves to write about "E3": evolution, ethology and ecology and the subtle relationships between these fields, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist's new blog can be accessed through any one of these five domain names: GrrlScientist.net, grrlscientist.org, grrlscientist.info, grrlscientist.com, or grrlscientist.us (keep in mind that, in the future, these domains may point to different places). GrrlScientist's current blog home is at her NATURE Network blog, Maniraptora.

Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Kolibri Expeditions, ScienceOnline09, Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs. More biographical information about GrrlScientist.

Follow GrrlScientist:

GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed at his site, Hero Machine.





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

$upport This Scholar

Worthy Causes to $upport

Meters and Counters

« Seeking Submissions: Scientia Pro Publica | Main | Harry Potter and his Secret Curse of ADHD »

Taco Bell's New Green Menu Takes No Ingredients From Nature

Topic Categories: EnvironmentGreen/Frugal LivingHumorSatireStreaming videos
Posted on: July 1, 2009 7:59 AM, by "GrrlScientist"

tags: , , , , ,

In this ONN report, we learn that Taco Bell has a new menu: it boasts zero environmental impact because they will rely solely on synthetic, lab-produced ingredients. [2:21]

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook

Comments

1

Um...exactly how is that "no environmental impact"? Everything's got to be produced somehow, and thier "impactless" uh..."food" could well have a greater impact simply by virtue of being synthetic. There's all the equipment needed, for one thing. Somewhere to uh...produce it. Growth media, flavor um...creators, extensive testing for safety, maintenance of facilities, transpo to and from...

And I'm sure there are a half a million fiddly little things I'm missing.

So unless these guys are alchemists, and can transmute whatever else it is that they're pulling out of their asses, this is not a "zero-impact" situation. Well, it wouldn't be even then, you'd somehow have to support the bullshit farms...

Posted by: Kate | July 1, 2009 12:43 PM

2

The bullshit farms are actually quite low impact. They're powered with the infra-red radiation from people blushing when they realise the YouTube clip they've just criticised is satire.

Posted by: Bob O'H | July 1, 2009 12:55 PM

3

Hahaha. To truly have no impact, the foods would also have to produce no bodily wastes.

Posted by: John | July 1, 2009 1:48 PM

4

The Onion news network is fake you idiots. It's satire.

Posted by: Ross | July 3, 2009 1:24 PM

5

Interpretation fail from 'Kate'.

Posted by: Rusty | July 6, 2009 10:35 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.