Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Living the Scientific Life (Scientist, Interrupted)

Written by an evolutionary biologist/ornithologist who writes about E3 -- Evolution, Ecology and Ethology -- and the subtle relationships between these phenomena, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist Tweets:

GrrlScientist's New Blog:

Search This Blog

Valuable Information

Concisus Vitae

GrrlScientist is an evolutionary biologist and ornithologist who loves to write about "E3": evolution, ethology and ecology and the subtle relationships between these fields, especially in birds.

GrrlScientist's new blog can be accessed through any one of these five domain names: GrrlScientist.net, grrlscientist.org, grrlscientist.info, grrlscientist.com, or grrlscientist.us (keep in mind that, in the future, these domains may point to different places). GrrlScientist's current blog home is at her NATURE Network blog, Maniraptora.

Online interviews with GrrlScientist: Kolibri Expeditions, ScienceOnline09, Nature Blog Network and ScienceBlogs. More biographical information about GrrlScientist.

Follow GrrlScientist:

GrrlScientist's banner was designed by graphic artist, Jeff Hebert, whose other work can be viewed at his site, Hero Machine.





Recent Posts

Recent Comments

$upport This Scholar

Worthy Causes to $upport

Meters and Counters

« What am I Doing Today? | Main | Mystery Bird: Black-capped Chickadee, Poecile atricapilla »

Was the Earth Designed for Life?

Topic Categories: GodlessnessReligionStreaming videos
Posted on: July 5, 2009 7:59 AM, by "GrrlScientist"

tags: , , , , , , , ,

This video provides an unbiased look at whether Earth's favorable conditions for life prove that a loving God planned it that way all along. (Hint: There's no other explanation.) [3:45]

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: PoliticsEducation

Comments

1

Right. I'm not going to watch, I don't have to watch (yay!), since those "privileged planet" hypotheses was destructed for all eternity this very week.

Astronomers reported the observation of the first double star double planetary disk system. Those stars, each capable of sustaining life in the future, are conveniently separated by a mere 400 AU or so. Which means that any inhabitants would be very much more motivated and capable than us for interstellar travel.

Earth is now officially a hum drum (and slightly sordid seeing the populace as demonstrated by the above kook video) backwater in the galaxy. Deal with it.

Posted by: Torbjörn Larsson, OM | July 5, 2009 10:55 AM

2

Torbjörn:
It's Edward Current, so 'kook' isn't exactly right.

Posted by: dreikin | July 5, 2009 12:46 PM

3

Since the discovery of the plentiful lifeforms on and surrounding deep ocean thermal vents, possibilities for ideal conditions for life must be expanded. Perhaps Noah was more capable than we might know.

Posted by: Zen Bonobo | July 5, 2009 3:54 PM

4

Dinsdale! Dinsdale!

The problem is, people without a brain will actually believe Current is: (1) right and (2) on their side. "I exist therefore there is a god" is one of the fundamentalists' favorite "proofs".

Posted by: MadScientist | July 5, 2009 10:39 PM

5

What people holding that theory don't want to believe or comprehend is the enormity and infinite vastness their supposed anthropomorphic god has created the universe to be. And that the number of sweet spot orbits and possible combinations for life developing from star stuff (tm) is huge. The idea this little planet is ALL there is in developed living self-consciousness is profoundly self centered and egotistical to the extreme.

Posted by: megancyber | July 6, 2009 12:22 AM

6

I don't see how this can be considered "unbiased". The tone of the narration during sequences involving accepted science, indicates that the author finds the scientific explanations preposterous. I accept your faith, I don't accept your ignorance.

Posted by: Seth | July 7, 2009 12:26 PM

7

^ is this a joke?

Posted by: surprised | July 7, 2009 1:43 PM

8

Currant is great fun but he does run smack up against Poe's law.

Posted by: jdhuey | July 10, 2009 9:19 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.