Now on ScienceBlogs: Oh, no! School wi-fi is making our kids sick! (2012 edition)
Seeking reason amidst the irrational madness of destroying one's only home.
Jennifer Jacquet is a postdoctoral research fellow working with Dr. Daniel Pauly and the Sea Around Us Project at the UBC Fisheries Centre. As a kid, she read 50 Simple Things Kids Can Do to Save the Earth and would come to discover that while those 50 things were indeed simple, saving the Earth was not.
July 30-August 1, 2010: Attending Sci Foo Camp hosted by Nature, O'Reilly and Google at the Googleplex, Mountain View, CA.
June 19, 2010: Presenting at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Annual Meeting at the University of Oregon in Eugene.May 2010: Counting fish: A typology for fisheries catch data published in The Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences.
May 3-7, 2010: Workshop: Incorporating Appropriate Ecological Baselines into Management of Ocean Resources at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.
April 24, 2010: Q&A following a screening of The End of the Line at the Food Film Festival in Portland, Oregon.
March 12, 2010: Presenting at the World Affairs Conference of Northern California in San Francisco.February 21, 2010: Co-organizing and presenting on the panel Preserving the Global Commons Through Conservation and Cooperation at the AAAS meeting in San Diego.
January-March 2010: Visiting lecturer at the Scripps Insitution of Oceanography, UCSD. Co-teaching Topics in Marine Conservation with Jeremy Jackson.
November 2009: Conserving Wild Fish in a Sea of Market-Based Efforts published online at Oryx
August 14, 2009: Dan Ax at Avukado Productions makes the following short video for Guilty Planet:
July 30, 2009: Successfully defended Ph.D. dissertation Fish as Food in an Age of Globalization at the University of British Columbia.
June 2009: Published at Conservation Biology: What Can Conservationists Learn from Investor Behavior?
May 27, 2009: Talk titled "Historical Renaming and Mislabeling of Fish" given the Oceans Past II conference in Vancouver, B.C.
May 24, 2009: Talk at the International Marine Conservation Congress in Washington, D.C.
March 24, 2009: Dave Beck and I showcase our jellyfish burger in Scientific American's photo gallery:
March 24, 2009: Talk at the Student Conference for Conservation Science at Cambridge University, UK.
March 14, 2009: Talk at the Kettle's Yard Problemathon for Cambridge's Science Festival.
March 3, 2009: Talk titled "Guilt v. Shame in Market Based Efforts to Save Our Fish" at the Max Planck Institute in Ploen, Germany.
February 27, 2009: Talk at Fauna & Flora International.
January-March 2009: Visiting researcher with Bill Sutherland's lab in the Conservation Science Group at the University of Cambridge.
November 2008: A new study In hot soup: sharks captured in Ecuador's waters published in Environmental Sciences.
November 2008:
« What Is Wrong with The Crying Indian PSA? | Main | What Can an Emoticon Do for Energy Use? »
Category: Consumed • Stylized Substance
Posted on: June 25, 2009 12:09 PM, by Jennifer L. Jacquet
McDonald's launched this ad for for their Filet-O-Fish sandwich this year (just in time for Lent). Their marketing strategy is an interesting one: a rare reminder that the fish you're eating comes from an animal that was once alive.
What if it were you hanging up on this wall? If it were you in that sandwich, you wouldn't be laughing at all.
EnvironmentTrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/113300
Comments
Somehow there's an oblique reference to transubstantiation in there. But I'm no longer Catholic, and I don't want to think about it ....
Posted by: Julie Stahlhut | June 25, 2009 2:53 PM
They've been trying a lot of new and (ahem) controversial things in their ads lately.
Posted by: The Science Pundit | June 25, 2009 5:09 PM
This is a reversal-in-letter-but-not-in-spirit of "suicide food", ads that show animals that want to be eaten, nicely cataloged on this funny and insightful blog:
http://suicidefood.blogspot.com/
Here, this wall trout seems to be singing that fish ought not to be eaten, but the goofiness of its display so undermines its message that what is put across by McDonalds is that it is harmless and fun to eat fish. Fish are not animals, they are animated yet fake toys, even as you eat them. In this sense, the wall trout represents a suicide food by so undermining the idea that one should not eat his kind that he is actually promoting it.
Posted by: cm | June 25, 2009 7:06 PM
This goes all the way back to Charlie the tuna. As a kid I always wondered about that; "Sorry, Charlie."
There are some fish that make sense to eat; the Illinois river is full of some invasive species of Chinese carp. They're big and apparently quite tasty but they look weird and nobody eats them locally. A local fisherman ships them by the ton to coastal restaurants.
Posted by: george.w | June 25, 2009 7:57 PM
Thats pretty bad, but I think the Chic-fil-A commercials with cows trying to convince you its better to eat chickens is even worse. Chick-fil-a bases their entire marketing strategy on that campaign.
Posted by: Joe | June 25, 2009 9:50 PM
Hey! Those Chick-fil-A ads are pretty funny. I still eat as much beef as chicken (I can't stand the taste of fish), but the cow playing the self-preservation card was a fun idea.
Posted by: Laborum | June 26, 2009 3:09 AM
That has be one of the worst McDonald's commercials ever. I'm more troubled by all the plastic, Styrofoam and other pollutants they produce. Fish is only a tiny section of the menu.
Posted by: MattL | June 26, 2009 9:19 AM
Of course, being the internet, there is an entire blog devoted to this subject.
Posted by: Carlie | June 26, 2009 9:35 AM
Thank you for this posting. I have been pondering it along with your other posts.
Last night I dreamt about locusts, but not of the Acrididae kind. It was the kind of dream where I wake up and have a really bad psychic neural hangover for most of the day, and I do not drink alcohol. Television commercials [corporate commercial free market warfare] promoting ‘cheap’ endless copious consumption of all food supplies in a finite biosphere give me these kinds of uncomfortable dreams too, though I am not sure they are dreams...
I comprehend external realities about economic food security, resource conservation and advertising differently in extreme ways, as I grew up surrounded by intense third world poverty. My baseline, is from 1960, when my first (non happy meal) memories about real food poverty, and people in starvation mode interactions began implementing themselves at the age of three... So, personally, I do not find much amusement, or honest beneficial/educational value in the contemporary use of the ‘Tele-Viewing’ technology that conjures up false, or confusing thinking about perpetual food buffets without consequence. But, I do believe firmly in a free market, and in non censored freedom of expression, so I do appreciate being able to study the operational mind sets of manipulation marketing philosophy that is not based in sustainable critical thinking and survival.
Right now, I am struggling with the delicate exploration of the feasible dynamics of educational [forward thinking] marketing versus profit driven consumption marketing that offers beneficial intellectual and emotional alternatives, for the growing consensus of people that believe on many diverse levels that food security is becoming our next big Y2K. Only, this preparation phase is much more complicated, and the potentiality of collapsing food supplies is not limited to rumor problems caused by theoretical future computing engineering failures.
Posted by: Chris | June 27, 2009 3:50 PM
Chris, to help lessen your anxiety...its made from Alaskan pollock which has gotten a sustainable ranking from several NGOs and according the NMFS stock assessments is not overfished... at least 75% of it is Pollock... the rest is fillers.
Posted by: jim | June 29, 2009 6:18 PM
I actually liked that commercial, mildly at least.
It makes sense for McDonald's since they are trying to convince people their highly processed foods are actually, well, real food. On some things, they are actually reasonably good social conscious wise... though always in service of profits. A lot like Walmart, when it is in their interest to actually do something good, they can be very powerful. However, they are amoral at the core.
Posted by: travc | July 1, 2009 6:34 AM