Now on ScienceBlogs: Surveying the "integrative medicine" landscape (2012 edition)

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Guilty Planet

Seeking reason amidst the irrational madness of destroying one's only home.

The Guilty Planet Blog

Jacquet_Berlin.jpgJennifer Jacquet is a postdoctoral research fellow working with Dr. Daniel Pauly and the Sea Around Us Project at the UBC Fisheries Centre. As a kid, she read 50 Simple Things Kids Can Do to Save the Earth and would come to discover that while those 50 things were indeed simple, saving the Earth was not.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Online Resources & Blogs

Projects & Publications

July 30-August 1, 2010: Attending Sci Foo Camp hosted by Nature, O'Reilly and Google at the Googleplex, Mountain View, CA.

June 19, 2010: Presenting at the Human Behavior and Evolution Society Annual Meeting at the University of Oregon in Eugene.

May 2010: Counting fish: A typology for fisheries catch data published in The Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences.

May 3-7, 2010: Workshop: Incorporating Appropriate Ecological Baselines into Management of Ocean Resources at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C.

April 24, 2010: Q&A following a screening of The End of the Line at the Food Film Festival in Portland, Oregon.

March 12, 2010: Presenting at the World Affairs Conference of Northern California in San Francisco.

February 21, 2010: Co-organizing and presenting on the panel Preserving the Global Commons Through Conservation and Cooperation at the AAAS meeting in San Diego.

January-March 2010: Visiting lecturer at the Scripps Insitution of Oceanography, UCSD. Co-teaching Topics in Marine Conservation with Jeremy Jackson.

November 2009: Conserving Wild Fish in a Sea of Market-Based Efforts published online at Oryx

August 14, 2009: Dan Ax at Avukado Productions makes the following short video for Guilty Planet:

July 30, 2009: Successfully defended Ph.D. dissertation Fish as Food in an Age of Globalization at the University of British Columbia.

June 2009: Published at Conservation Biology: What Can Conservationists Learn from Investor Behavior?

May 27, 2009: Talk titled "Historical Renaming and Mislabeling of Fish" given the Oceans Past II conference in Vancouver, B.C.

May 24, 2009: Talk at the International Marine Conservation Congress in Washington, D.C.

March 24, 2009: Dave Beck and I showcase our jellyfish burger in Scientific American's photo gallery:

beck_jacquet_jellyburger.jpg


March 24, 2009: Talk at the Student Conference for Conservation Science at Cambridge University, UK.

March 14, 2009: Talk at the Kettle's Yard Problemathon for Cambridge's Science Festival.

March 3, 2009: Talk titled "Guilt v. Shame in Market Based Efforts to Save Our Fish" at the Max Planck Institute in Ploen, Germany.

February 27, 2009: Talk at Fauna & Flora International.

January-March 2009: Visiting researcher with Bill Sutherland's lab in the Conservation Science Group at the University of Cambridge.

November 2008: A new study In hot soup: sharks captured in Ecuador's waters published in Environmental Sciences.

November 2008:

« Jellyfish and Vermin: The Future of Food? | Main | Arctic Goo: Dat New New »

Industry-Sponsored Polluted Seafood Calculator

Category: ConsumedFood SystemsSeafoodWhat the...?
Posted on: July 13, 2009 4:39 PM, by Jennifer L. Jacquet

As a way of counteracting some of the work by Environmental Working Group, the Sea Turtle Restoration Project, and Oceana to inform consumers about the health risks of consuming too much seafood, a new website was just launched called HowMuchFish.com, which tells you how much mercury-laden tuna, salmon, and shrimp you can 'safely' consume.

Although it might not be obvious at first glance, HowMuchFish.com is sponsored by the Center for Consumer Freedom -- "a nonprofit coalition of restaurants, food companies, and consumers working together to promote personal responsibility". Check out their website claiming to mythbust the studies demonstrating health effects of high fructose corn syrup, high meat intake, and now seafood. This is a group of people who profit from seafood sales. When it comes to seafood and its effect on your health, is this really a group you would trust?

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Environment

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/114772

Comments

1

I received some information from this HowMuchFish group some time ago, and they seemed a little too eager to push the "a little mercury isn't that bad" message. After some light research, sure enough, there was the link to Center for Consumer Freedom.

It has become apparent to me that any organizations with the word Freedom in their title are likely abusing the term for their own interest.

Posted by: DownHouse | July 14, 2009 8:30 PM

2

I'm with them on high-fructose corn syrup. (Scientifically, at least; not necessarily on agricultural policy.)

Remember how through the 1990's, the nutritionists had the same hand-waving to explain why fructose was healthier than sucrose? Remember Frookies?

Posted by: JSinger | July 15, 2009 3:44 PM

3

Mercury accumulates in the water naturally and through anthropogenic sources, mainly cement plants, chlorine factories (and the biggest culprit) coal-burning power plants. The mercury molecules are released into the air and fall into the water where bacteria and other micro-organisms change the mercury into methyl mercury, the form most dangerous to humans. Fish in-turn consume the micro-organisms and accumulate the methyl mercury in their tissue. Predatory fish bioaccumulate much more elevated mercury levels in comparison to non-predatory fish, so even land-locked fresh water fish such as bass can bioaccumulate dangerous levels of methyl mercury even though they never reach the ocean. Another thing to note is that ALL SEAFOOD CONTAINS SOME LEVEL OF MERCURY! Don’t for one second believe that something is safe simply because the FDA or EPA (or especially the fishing industry!) tells you that species doesn’t accumulate mercury. Its just not true. All seafood has mercury in it, it really depends on HOW MUCH that particular fish has accuumulated…
However, safe seafood is available though! For the first time there is a company that doesn’t rely on only the age or location of the fish caught to claim that it is lower in mercury than FDA action levels. Safe Harbor GUARANTEES that the fish it certifies is lower than FDA action levels because it tests every large fin fish released under the Safe Harbor brand. For the first time I am 100% confident about the safety of the seafood I eat and buy for my family. All their mercury certification levels are available online, along with details about their testing process and where their product is available at http://www.safeharborfoods.com
Check their site out, learn more on the issue and enjoy seafood without worry! I know that I now eat seafood and serve it to my family with confidence.

Posted by: Christine | July 23, 2009 1:43 PM

4

So we should trust NGOs whose mission is NOT to protect human health but to reduce fishing? That seems equally as unreliable. I think the only reliable source for information on fish consumption is the FDA and EPA. These government people know about risk assessment more than anyone and are the best qualified to make guidelines for the public.

Posted by: jim | July 23, 2009 3:35 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.