Now on ScienceBlogs: Let the War on Christmas being. Atheist style.

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Highly Allochthonous

News and Commentary From the Wide World of Earth Science

Search

The Authors

You're not missing much Chris Rowan is a geologist specialising in the dark arts of paleomagnetism, and getting people to pay him to travel to exotic destinations for fieldwork. Having drilled up New Zealand during his PhD, and South Africa in his first post-doc, he now works at the University of Edinburgh.

Chris on Twitter


A girl, a pack, a forest, a river Anne Jefferson has a love of all things water-related and blends hydrology, geomorphology, geology, and climate change in her work. She has a Ph.D. from Oregon State University and is now an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

What the heck does 'Highly Allochthonous' mean?
Blog Facebook Page
Ye olde blog

Geoblogosphere latest


Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogs I read

Categories

Archives

« Geologists in peril - and liking it? | Main | Where the Earth's magnetic field comes from »

Uninquisitive

Category: academic lifegeneral science
Posted on: March 6, 2008 8:43 AM, by Chris Rowan

I think that I've figured out the New Mexico Department of Cultural Affairs' problem. When the Aetogate scandal whipped up enough fuss to force them to hold an official inquiry, they pulled 'Inquiries 101' off the shelf, only to discover that most of the pages had been ripped out. What they had was this:

  • Convening your panel (although the meaning of a partial page headed "Conflicts of-" had been lost forever).

  • Taking evidence from accused party.

Unfortunately, their reference volume was missing these rather vital sections:

  • Taking evidence from the accusing party.

  • Identifying discrepancies in the opposing testimonies.

  • Investigating and untangling said discrepancies.

  • Reaching a balanced conclusion.

The missing pages led to the rather truncated proceedings reported on in yesterday's Albuquerque Journal (see also Julia and Brian's takes) . On the plus side, we now have Spencer Lucas' response (pdf) to Parker and Martz's accusations (see the The Reptipage for some analysis). Unfortunately, however, the "inquiry" didn't seem particularly curious about the numerous places in the rebuttal of Parker's allegations where the two accounts obviously conflict, leaving us outside observers with a "he said", "she said" situation, and nothing really resolved.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM