Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Highly Allochthonous

News and Commentary From the Wide World of Earth Science

Search

Announcement

This blog has now moved to: http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous

The Authors

You're not missing much Chris Rowan is a geologist specialising in the dark arts of paleomagnetism, and getting people to pay him to travel to exotic destinations for fieldwork. Having drilled up New Zealand during his PhD, and South Africa in his first post-doc, he now works at the University of Edinburgh.

Chris on Twitter


A girl, a pack, a forest, a river Anne Jefferson has a love of all things water-related and blends hydrology, geomorphology, geology, and climate change in her work. She has a Ph.D. from Oregon State University and is now an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

Anne on Twitter


What the heck does 'Highly Allochthonous' mean?
Blog Facebook Page
Ye olde blog

Geoblogosphere latest


Geotweetage


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogs I read

Categories

Archives

Sb/DonorsChoose Drive


Thanks!

« Update: Arctic Ice | Main | Geopuzzle #10 »

Update: Aetogate

Category: academic lifegeneral science
Posted on: April 3, 2008 3:41 PM, by Chris Rowan

It's no surprise that neither Bill Parker nor Jeff Martz were particularly impressed with the inquiry that wasn't, and they've both posted responses that should have been solicited anyway over at Mike Taylor's site. It's of particular interest to me that Parker has both electronic and eye-witness testimony which fairly clearly refutes some of the claims made in Spencer Lucas' submission about the dates and circumstances of his access to the NMMNHS palaeontological collection; an object lesson in why both sides should perhaps have been involved in the proceedings.

Just to make things official, these reponses form the core of a formal response (pdfs) to the inquiry's verdict, which has just been sent to the New Mexico Department of Cultural Affairs. It's hard to predict what, if anything, will happen now; not only has the response of the NMMNHS so far been almost as damaging as the original (very serious) allegations, but it has also burnt most of the bridges to a constructive and amicable resolution.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Education & Careers

Comments

1

Thanks for the update, Chris. I personally doubt if we'll ever get a satisfactory response from anyone in New Mexico. Hopefully, the eventual report from the SVP ethics committee will provide a good resolution.

Posted by: chezjake | April 3, 2008 8:51 PM

2

Well said; the DCA inquiry was a farce, and tremendously damaging for all concerned. I'm waiting for the completion of the investigation by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Ethics Education Committee. I have no idea when that will be, but it seems to be the most hopeful basis for some substantive resolution, amicable or otherwise.

A statement from the SVP is available here: Statement from the Executive Committee regarding allegations against Spencer Lucas.

Posted by: Duae Quartunciae | April 3, 2008 8:56 PM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.