Spot (and explain, if you can) the differences.
It's not much of a hint to say that the last one is quite difficult - but the last one is quite difficult.
Update: Click through for the answer.
Highly Allochthonous
News and Commentary From the Wide World of Earth Science
Search
The Authors
Chris Rowan is a geologist specialising in the dark arts of paleomagnetism, and getting people to pay him to travel to exotic destinations for fieldwork. Having drilled up New Zealand during his PhD, and South Africa in his first post-doc, he now works at the University of Edinburgh.
Anne Jefferson has a love of all things water-related and blends hydrology, geomorphology, geology, and climate change in her work. She has a Ph.D. from Oregon State University and is now an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
What the heck does 'Highly Allochthonous' mean?
Blog Facebook Page
Ye olde blog
Geoblogosphere latest
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Thanks!
Recent Comments
- Chris Rowan on Blogging, tweeting and conferences
- Robert on Blogging, tweeting and conferences
- Veltyen on Earthquake hazard mitigation the Iranian way
- Lab Lemming on To our amazing readers, we are humbled. Post requests are now open.
- Chris Rowan on Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week
- Lab Lemming on Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week
- Marcel Waldvogel on Earthquake hazard mitigation the Iranian way
- Max Tardiveau on Could an iPhone be a useful field tool?
- Harold Asmis on Earthquakes within plates: we don't know when, and we may not know where
- Chris Rowan on Earthquakes within plates: we don't know when, and we may not know where
Recent Posts
- Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week
- Earthquakes within plates: we don't know when, and we may not know where
- Earthquake hazard mitigation the Iranian way
- Advice and Advocacy
- To our amazing readers, we are humbled. Post requests are now open.
- ScienceOnline 2010: geobloggers required
- Hydrogeology and geomorphology: Notes from GSA Monday and Tuesday
- The Hydrology and Evolution of Basaltic Landscapes: Notes from GSA Sunday
- Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week
- Blogging, tweeting and conferences
Blogs I read
-
Geology (rotating)
- Head In a Cloud
- James' Empty Blog
- Open Mind
- RealClimate
- Stoat
- According to Colwell
- Bad Astronomy
- Bad Science
- Centauri Dreams
- Panda's Thumb
- Am I a woman scientist?
- Minor Revisions
- Propter Doc
- Rising to the Occasion
- Sciencewoman
- The Accretionary Wedge
- The Boneyard
Fossils (rotating)
Climate
Misc. Science
Scientists
Carnivals
Categories
- academic life
- bloggery
- by Anne
- climatology
- deep time
- environment
- fieldwork
- general science
- geohazards
- geology
- geomorphology
- gifts and gadgets
- hydrogeology
- paper reviews
- past worlds
- photos
- science education
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
« Active, dormant, and extinct volcanoes | Main | Pangaea Day, geology-style »
Geopuzzle #11
Category: geopuzzling
Posted on: May 9, 2008 10:48 AM, by Chris Rowan
Find more posts in: 
Physical Science
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
Comments
I'm going to take a wild guess. The top one has asymmetric ripples formed in a stream dominated environment, the centre one symmetrical ripples caused by shallow water waves and the down one is ripples deposited by wind blown sand/silt.
Posted by: Lost Geologist | May 9, 2008 11:54 AM
I agree w/ Lost Geologist that the upper and middle look like asymmetric and more symmetric, respectively. Additionally, the crests on the upper one are straighter relative to middle, which are getting towards lingoid.
The bottom photo has two layers of slightly different directions superimposed on the outcrop. But, in terms of general characteristics, the ripple marks look more like the upper photo than the middle. But, I'm probably missing something obvious.
Posted by: BrianR | May 9, 2008 12:59 PM
I agree. In the lower photo the crests of the ripples seem much longer than the top two photos (laterally uniform current), it's also lighter in color with a red hue (oxidizing environment, less clay), and there is a ~45 degree change in current direction in a small vertical distance (short duration current direction changes). Without seeing inverse grading on the ripples, I'd say the bottom photo is eolian in origin as well. I can't wait to hear the answer!
Posted by: Mel | May 9, 2008 4:36 PM
The last one looks like my kitchen floor...
Posted by: Transient Reporter | May 10, 2008 9:55 PM
The bottom photo ripples are also much more laterally continuous, which makes me think wind. Are all of these in a close proximity? If so, you could have a stream entering an ocean with a beach. I had a field trip to a site like that once, and it was really cool to see all of the ripple forms close together. Also, any ripples in the sand in the background in photo 1?
Posted by: ScienceWoman | May 12, 2008 1:00 PM
so ... are ya just gonna leave us hangin'?
Posted by: BrianR | May 13, 2008 7:05 PM