Spot (and explain, if you can) the differences.
It's not much of a hint to say that the last one is quite difficult - but the last one is quite difficult.
Update: Click through for the answer.
Highly Allochthonous
News and Commentary From the Wide World of Earth Science
Search
Announcement
This blog has now moved to:
http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous
The Authors
Chris Rowan is a geologist specialising in the dark arts of paleomagnetism, and getting people to pay him to travel to exotic destinations for fieldwork. Having drilled up New Zealand during his PhD, and South Africa in his first post-doc, he now works at the University of Edinburgh.
Anne Jefferson has a love of all things water-related and blends hydrology, geomorphology, geology, and climate change in her work. She has a Ph.D. from Oregon State University and is now an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
What the heck does 'Highly Allochthonous' mean?
Blog Facebook Page
Ye olde blog
Geoblogosphere latest
Geotweetage
Recent Comments
- Michael on Saltation
- Passerby on What the heck does Highly Allochthonous mean?
- Passerby on Dear readers: tell us about yourself
- Jude on Dear readers: tell us about yourself
- jillian on Today's Hot Topic? Bottled Water
- Elli on Dear readers: tell us about yourself
- Brandon on Today's Hot Topic? Bottled Water
- Solius on Unconformity
- Paul Strickland on Top Kill: what BP is trying to do
- EKoh on Unconformity
Recent Posts
- Saltation
- Unconformity
- Today's Hot Topic? Bottled Water
- Stuff we linked to on Twitter last week
- Dear readers: tell us about yourself
- Friday focal mechanisms
- How do we know Gabon's 'multicellular' fossils are 2.1 billion years old?
- Creeping fault segments are showing their age
- Stuff I linked to on Twitter last week
- Yellowstone it was
Blogs I read
-
Geology (rotating)
- Head In a Cloud
- James' Empty Blog
- Open Mind
- RealClimate
- Stoat
- According to Colwell
- Bad Astronomy
- Bad Science
- Centauri Dreams
- Panda's Thumb
- Am I a woman scientist?
- Minor Revisions
- Propter Doc
- Rising to the Occasion
- Sciencewoman
- The Accretionary Wedge
- The Boneyard
Fossils (rotating)
Climate
Misc. Science
Scientists
Carnivals
Categories
- academic life
- bloggery
- by Anne
- climate science
- deep time
- environment
- fieldwork
- general science
- geohazards
- geology
- gifts and gadgets
- paper reviews
- past worlds
- photos
- science education
Archives
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
Sb/DonorsChoose Drive
Thanks!
« Active, dormant, and extinct volcanoes | Main | Pangaea Day, geology-style »
Geopuzzle #11
Category: geopuzzling
Posted on: May 9, 2008 10:48 AM, by Chris Rowan
Find more posts in: 
Physical Science
Physical Science
Comments
I'm going to take a wild guess. The top one has asymmetric ripples formed in a stream dominated environment, the centre one symmetrical ripples caused by shallow water waves and the down one is ripples deposited by wind blown sand/silt.
Posted by: Lost Geologist | May 9, 2008 11:54 AM
I agree w/ Lost Geologist that the upper and middle look like asymmetric and more symmetric, respectively. Additionally, the crests on the upper one are straighter relative to middle, which are getting towards lingoid.
The bottom photo has two layers of slightly different directions superimposed on the outcrop. But, in terms of general characteristics, the ripple marks look more like the upper photo than the middle. But, I'm probably missing something obvious.
Posted by: BrianR | May 9, 2008 12:59 PM
I agree. In the lower photo the crests of the ripples seem much longer than the top two photos (laterally uniform current), it's also lighter in color with a red hue (oxidizing environment, less clay), and there is a ~45 degree change in current direction in a small vertical distance (short duration current direction changes). Without seeing inverse grading on the ripples, I'd say the bottom photo is eolian in origin as well. I can't wait to hear the answer!
Posted by: Mel | May 9, 2008 4:36 PM
The last one looks like my kitchen floor...
Posted by: Transient Reporter | May 10, 2008 9:55 PM
The bottom photo ripples are also much more laterally continuous, which makes me think wind. Are all of these in a close proximity? If so, you could have a stream entering an ocean with a beach. I had a field trip to a site like that once, and it was really cool to see all of the ripple forms close together. Also, any ripples in the sand in the background in photo 1?
Posted by: ScienceWoman | May 12, 2008 1:00 PM
so ... are ya just gonna leave us hangin'?
Posted by: BrianR | May 13, 2008 7:05 PM