So, I do attract the occasional nutter email, and they meet the trash can pretty quickly, but this fellow put so much verbal affort at this one sent to my Facebook account I thought I should share the laugh.
Check it out below:
Sat with numerous scientists in earth and climate science and laughed our collective asses off that someone actually believes the bullshit regarding AGW. the astronomers in the group quickly point out the idiots like yourself are far more likely to run headlong into the ice berg of global cooling before you realize the Titanic sized ship of stupidity lead by Captain MANN and his idiot minions realize their legions of hellish doom are wrong. Cut baby and wife, but shut the F up when it comes to your AGW crap. You are either a bad scientist or a sell-out for political purposes, but absolutely not right on your ridiculous answer in GRIST. Most “skeptics” are just exceptional scientists doing the real solid work of science and not pushing a political agenda like you. I am a LEED AP as well so sustainable design and building is of significant importance to me. CO2 has nothing to do with GCC. There is so little in science that is so blessedly understood as well with volumes of geophysical data to back it up that one can only surmise the frauds like you are intentionally leading people astray for some nefarious reason. We “skeptics” know science isn’t behind your motive because the flaws in your data pints and assumptions are so incredibly obvious, Your summary reports (IGPCC and IPP) are just manipulative crap. Your answer on CO2 and volcanoes is very very wrong and it takes no genius to recognize it. It was estimated that the amount of CO2 emitted by Pinitubu alone equaled more than two years of net unabsorbed human output. Inasmuch as better than 80% of out-gassing is under the ocean’s surface we are still trying to get a rational read on it, But any physics student can measure the enormous amount of energy required to heat the surface of the oceans (top 1 foot) by one degree and realizes it is an enormous number in BTU’s….and that cannot come from Greenhouse gas at all. It is like trying to hear a freezing human with the latent heat from the beating wings of a nat. We aren’t stupid dude. It’s only possible to change surface temperatures and therefore climates by either changes in solar radiation received per m2, by actually thickening the atmospheric blanket so that the heat/energy exchange traps more heat right at the ocean’s surface or via internal heat dissipation via the oceans and since ocean temps determine climate, you need to start there. Of those three scenarios, the changes in heat retention by adding one molecule of CO2 in 10,000 is by far and away the least likely to affect much of anything. You’ve mostly ignored the likely fluctuations in solar radiation and the environmental affects of the interstellar medium (the vacuuity of space). Oh sorry, I may be speaking way over your head. I am not sure why I am bothering you, but your lie disgusts me. You should be ashamed of the answer you put out there since it is at best an ignorant lie on your part. At worst, you are purposely leading humanity down a path that it may well wish it did not ever come across. The present temperature rate change is nothing unusual, in fact relatively small and minor in retrospect to numerous studies going back through the little Dryas to the beginning of the Holocene. For much of the first 5,000 years that ended about 2000-1500 BC, the earth was more than 3-5 degrees warmer than now….dude, so well established a fact that it seems unbelievable that you think we are all as dumb as polar bears…oh wait, they survived and thrived during warmer times….sorry to have burst your mythological bubble. In any event real scientists know the sham, we are on to all of you and fortunately the time will come when you will all be exposed for the bastard liars that you are. Have a nice day!
(formatting and misspelling from original)
I won’t, but is there any useful reply to make to something like this?