A Few Things Ill Considered

Featured image is one of 19 illustrated haiku laying out the IPCC Summary for Policy Makers, see them all here.
This weekly posting is brought to you courtesy of H. E. Taylor. Happy reading, I hope you enjoy this week’s Global Warming news roundup

skip to bottom

Sipping from the Internet Firehose…

January 19, 2014

co2now gfx skeptisci app gfx


Laugh. I dare ya:

Here’s your touch of surreal for the week:




  1. #1 Mike Haseler
    January 21, 2014

    Hi I am writing to you on behalf on the Scottish Climate & Energy Forum, we are conducting a survey of those interesting in the climate debate which should be of interest to all involved.

    The main focus is on the education and work experience of participants, but it will also assess employment and social factors for their relationship with views on climate.

    We would be very grateful if you would take the time to complete the survey. The responses are confidential.

    The url is: http://scef.org.uk/survey/index.php/868721/lang/en.


    Mike Haseler

  2. #2 PaulinMI
    January 21, 2014

    What debate?

  3. #3 mandas
    January 21, 2014

    Yes Mike – what debate? You mean the one between real scientists and lying deniers?

  4. #4 PaulinMI
    January 21, 2014

    Maybe he means the debate on the time line for reducing emmisions to zero?
    Whaddya say Mike?

  5. #5 Wow
    January 21, 2014

    Why should he say what debate when you’re running around like a headless chook squawking various claims of what the debate is, pauline?

  6. #6 freddy
    January 27, 2014

    wow, poor argument, please explain again what you think on the subject because nobody can follow this nonsense

  7. #7 Wow
    January 27, 2014

    yes, poor argument. Actually, no argument at all. As usual from you kai.

  8. #8 Wow
    January 29, 2014

    kai, you’re unusually illogical and raving. Why the sudden upsurge in this aberrant activity from you?

  9. #9 robby
    San Diego
    February 4, 2014

    Lying deniers. Is that a scientific term or an appeal to dogma. Glad to see the spirt of scientific skepticism and free inquiry are still alive.

  10. #10 Wow
    February 4, 2014

    Neither, robby.

    It’s a description.

    PS skepticism isn’t “I don’t believe you” in the face of evidence.

  11. #11 mandas
    February 7, 2014

    “….Lying deniers. Is that a scientific term or an appeal to dogma…”

    Since it is my post, I will answer for you robby.

    It’s a scientific term. Lying – as in deliberately stating false information. Deniers – as in people people who ignore evidence that runs counter to their ideological worldview.

    Any more questions?