Consensus, Criticism, Communication | Planet3.0.
This is a well written and comprehensive discussion of the “97% consensus” message, have a look!
Thanks Coby. As the article points out, consensus really is a meaningless concept in science. What matters is the evidence.
And on that score, 97% is a low number.
I suspect 97% is an understatement…
97% of what???
97% of 100% of course.
mandass, wrong answer! to what is 100% related? specify
freddy – it was the right answer.
Just because you are mathematically challenged (ie stupid) does not mean everyone else is.
mandass, your concept is not convincing.
Of course not freddy – evidence and facts have never been able to convince deniers like yourself.
Here is a picture of me caring —>
Notify me of followup comments via E-Mail.
I have a sad announcement to make, further to my previous posting about a missing edition…
Filed under “data can be cool”
This is a graph of wind and air pressure at a…
Aside from the climate blogosphere, Paul Krugman’s “Conscience of a Liberal” is my most regular blog…
Only In It For The Gold: Neither Optimist nor Pessimist, Just Activist.
“We must stop treating the…
Just a quick note to regulars and those who like to visit the weekly GW News…