Respectful Insolence

This rating sounds about right

This one’s been floating around ScienceBlogs and the blogosphere in general; so I thought, what the hell? (Oh, wait, did my use of the word “hell” affect my rating?) In any case, this sounds about right:

Online Dating

Mingle2Online Dating

You’ll be happy to know that I don’t really plan on trying to “evolve” to rate a PG-13 or R rating. I really see no need, although sometimes the comments probably earn such ratings. On the other hand, I won’t shy away from “adult” content if I consider it sufficiently important that I want to blog about it.

Comments

  1. #1 llewelly
    June 23, 2007

    Interestingly, several of your EneMan posts (like this one ) are G rated.
    Unfortunately, some of your breast cancer posts (here) are rated NC-17.

  2. #2 AnnR
    June 23, 2007

    Was it the implied slur to Oklahomans and Californians in the bc posts that bumped their ratings up?

  3. #3 The Ridger
    June 23, 2007

    Mentioning death and danger enough times will jack your rating up to NC-17, too, without any sexy stuff at all. Even if the danger is all in Alexander Hamilton quotes about the government…

  4. #4 llewelly
    June 23, 2007

    AnnR, I’m not going back to the rating site again, but I believe it was 46 mentions of breast and 1 mention of death that got the BC article an NC-17.

  5. #5 Sid Schwab
    June 24, 2007

    I got a NC-17. Too much knife and rectum, I think.