Now on ScienceBlogs: Spirited Debate with Ray and Kirk

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Respectful Insolence

"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." The miscellaneous ramblings of a surgeon/scientist on medicine, quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him)

Who (or what) is Orac?

orac.jpg Orac is the nom de blog of a (not so) humble pseudonymous surgeon/scientist with an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his miscellaneous verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few will. (Continued here, along with a DISCLAIMER that you should read before reading any medical discussions here.)

Orac's old Blog is archived at Archived Insolence.



Add to Technorati Favorites

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Submit to Skeptical Blog Anthology 2009
award_lr.gif
Winner, Best Health Policies/Ethics Weblog of 2008


The 2008 Weblog Awards

skepchick2008top10.jpg


evolution.gif

Archives

Non-Orac Insolence

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences

finalist2007_150x100.jpg
medicalhealth150.jpg
2005 Weblog Award

« Detroit Rock City | Main | Seen at the local Barnes & Noble Bookstore last night...part 2 »

Seen at the local Barnes & Noble Bookstore last night...

Category: Alternative medicineHumorMedicineQuackery
Posted on: September 30, 2007 9:03 AM, by Orac

I think the title says it all. Perfect!

Reiki.jpg

Whoever wrote the book sure knows her potential readers!

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

On the other hand, a friend of mine has a copy of "Chemotherapy & Radiation for Dummies", so be careful what you make fun of. :-) There's a "for Dummies" book for everything you can imagine. Maybe we should write "Writing 'for Dummies' Books for Dummies"?

Posted by: Barry Leiba | September 30, 2007 10:40 AM

2

My suggestion: Homeopathic Dilution and Succussion for the Terminally Stupid

Actually funnier: http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/

See the title:
ACUPUNCTURE STILL
NOT SUITABLE FOR
EYE CONDITIONS

Posted by: Watt de Fawke | September 30, 2007 10:48 AM

3

but it's all trumped by The Complete Idiot's Guide for Dummies...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Complete-Idiots-Guide-Dummies-Stupidity/dp/1580081746

Posted by: PlanetaryGear | September 30, 2007 11:17 AM

4

One must be cautious about a book on Chemotherapy and Radiation if it is published by the same goofs who have books on reiki. Their books on software are quite useful.

Posted by: Joe | September 30, 2007 11:51 AM

5

I think it's a misprint. They clearly forgot to include the word "IS" in that title.

Come to think of it, if the "For Dummies" publisher is going to do a set of books on alternative medicine, perhaps someone should print up a lot of little black stickers with the word "IS" printed on them in yellow.

Sufficiently responsible persons could then adjust the title to reflect the contents.

Posted by: Crosius | September 30, 2007 12:06 PM

6

I'm waiting for Reiki car repair, where they wave their hands over the problem area and people pay them $500.

Posted by: Amy Alkon | September 30, 2007 12:33 PM

7
I'm waiting for Reiki car repair, where they wave their hands over the problem area and people pay them $500.

No! That's just your local neighbourhood car mechanic.

Posted by: Thony C. | September 30, 2007 1:53 PM

8

One of the most appalling things I've seen at Barnes and Noble is a display on the side of the shelves that had new medical/medicine books were one of Kevin Trudeau's Natural Cure books happened to be on the display.

Posted by: Chris | September 30, 2007 2:16 PM

9

Not perfect; actually, the title is redundant.

Though there is some demi-poetic ambiguity in whether the "for dummies" part is meant to refer to the "practitioner" of reiki, the recipient ... or both.

Posted by: Warren | October 1, 2007 11:24 AM

10

You definitly need this book in your library right next to Feng Shui for Dummies.

Posted by: David Tyler | October 1, 2007 12:54 PM

11

I'm starting to think that the only way to deal with my irritation at people who fall for reiki, homeopathy, cranial sacral therapy, and the like is to set up shop doing these things and start taking their money in large chunks. I know I'll feel better, and if they don't, they just need to see me twice as frequently.

Posted by: isles | October 1, 2007 11:15 PM

12

On a semi-related note, the local bookstore in the area I grew up would have put this book on their shelf labeled "Science & Occult".

Posted by: Marc B | October 2, 2007 4:42 AM

14

Why are you dummies being such assholes about Reiki? Live and let live. At least they're TRYING to help someone, not snarking soullessly on a worthless blog.

Posted by: Lauren | October 5, 2007 11:22 PM

15

Because reiki postulates an incredibly unlikely and dubious mechanism of action?

Because there's no evidence that it works?

As for your comment about their "trying to help someone," would you say the same thing about a well-meaning conventional doctor whose use of long-abandoned therapies from the realm of scientific medicine was at best ineffective and at worst prevented his patients from getting therapy known to be effective?

Posted by: Orac | October 6, 2007 12:35 PM




ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM