The stupid, it does so burn.
Respectful Insolence
"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." The miscellaneous ramblings of a surgeon/scientist on medicine,
quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him)
Search this blog
Who (or what) is Orac?
Orac is the nom de blog of a humble pseudonymous surgeon/scientist with an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his miscellaneous verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few will. (Continued here, along with a DISCLAIMER that you should read before reading any medical discussions here.)
Orac's old Blog is archived at Archived Insolence.
Recent Posts
- Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- The 86th Meeting of the Skeptics' Circle: A bitch of a meeting. Really.
- A (kind of) new cancer research blog
- When popularity outpaces science in surgery
- Geez, give a guy tenure...
- Be afraid, be very, very afraid, people of Butler County, PA...
- No justice for Abubakar Tariq Nadama after all?
- Spell-checking is a good thing
- The "mind-body" connection series on NBC News
- "Why aren't there more clinical trials studying the effect of CAM on cancer?" cries the CAM advocate
Recent Comments
- Ktesibios on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Glenn on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Jim on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Rev. BigDumbChimp on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Heather on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- wackyvorlon on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Oldfart on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Oldfart on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- Patrick on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
- StuV on Your Friday Dose of Woo: The secret life of plants
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
Non-Orac Insolence
-
Medicine
- AIDSTruth.org
- Aggravated DocSurg
- Alternative Medicine and Cancer
- The Antidote
- Australian Council Against Health Fraud
- Autism Diva
- Autism News Beat
- The Best Shots Blog
- Bioethics Discussion Blog
- Bioethics Web Log
- Black Triangle
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
- A Chance to Cut is a Chance to Cure
- Confessions of a Quackbuster
- Correcting the AIDS Lies
- DB's Medical Rants
- Dr. Len's Cancer Blog
- Ethics of Vaccines
- Evidence-based Medicine First
- Focus on the AIDS/HIV connection
- GruntDoc
- Health Care Renewal
- HealthLawProf blog
- Healthwatch (U.K.)
- Healthwatcher.net
- Inside Surgery
- Kevin, M.D.
- Medgadget.com
- Neurodiversity Weblog
- Neurologica Blog
- Notes from Dr. R.W.
- pathtalk.org
- Pharmagossip
- Pharmalot
- Polite Dissent
- The Quack-Files
- The Quack-O-Meter
- QuackWatch
- RangelMD.com
- Science-based Medicine
- Surgeonsblog
- Terra Sigillata
- Aetiology
- Bad Astronomy Blog
- Cosmic Variance
- Deltoid
- ERV
- Eye on Science
- Good Math, Bad Math
- Improbable Research
- The Intersection
- In the Pipeline
- Living the Scientific Life
- The Loom
- MacResearch
- Medical Writing, Editing & Grantsmanship
- The Panda's Thumb
- The Personal Genome
- Pharyngula
- Pro-Science
- Real Climate
- The Red Notebook
- Sandwalk
- SciAm Observations
- Science After Sunclipse
- Science Creative Quarterly
- Scientia Natura
- Sex, Drugs, and DNA
- Talk Origins Archive
- Thoughts from Kansas
- Action Skeptics
- Bad Science
- The Bronze Blog
- Butterflies and Wheels
- California Skeptics
- Center for Inquiry
- Center for Inquiry Metro NYC
- Church of Critical Thinking
- Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
- Conspiracy Factory
- The Crackpot Page
- Crank dot Net
- Critical Thinking Community
- Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
- denialism.com
- Fallacies, Errors, and Tricks
- The Fallacy Files
- Freethought Weekly
- Handbook of Fallacies
- Holy Smoke
- Indiana Skeptics
- Infophilia
- The Inoculated Mind
- Logical Fallacies (Adam Smith Institute)
- The Mad Revisionist
- Memoirs of a Skepchick
- The Millennium Project
- Mondo Skepto
- Museum of Hoaxes
- The New England Skeptical Society
- North Texas Skeptics
- Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking
- A Photon in the Darkness
- Point of Inquiry
- Pooflingers Anonymous
- Practical Skepticism
- Podblack Blog
- James Randi Educational Foundation
- Rationally Speaking
- The Rogues Gallery
- Sinbad's Bullshit Detector
- Skeptic Friends Network
- Skeptic Magazine (UK)
- The Skeptical Alchemist
- Skeptical Information Links
- Skeptico
- SkepticReport.com
- The Skeptic's Dictionary
- The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe
- The Skeptics Society
- Snopes.com: Urban Legends
- Stop Sylvia Browne
- The Straight Dope
- Stupid Evil Bastard
- Two Percent Company
- The Uncredible Hallq
- Unscrewing the Inscrutable
- ZeroIntelligence.net
- Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum
- Cybrary of the Holocaust
- Dachau Concentration Camp
- DeathCamps.org
- Documentary resources on the Nazi genocide
- En Dansk Holocaust-ressource
- The Forgotten Camps
- History on Trial
- The Holocaust Controversies
- The Holocaust Chronicle
- Holocaust Denial On Trial
- Holocaust Forgotten
- The Holocaust History Project
- Holocaust and Humanity
- Holocaust/Shoah
- Holocaust/Shoah page
- David Irving debunked
- The Mazal Library
- Nizkor
- Simon Wiesenthal Center
- U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum
- WillisCarto.com
- American Aces of WWII
- Art Kramer's WWII Pictures
- Axis History Factbook
- Early Modern Notes
- Freedom, Democide, War
- German Propaganda Archive
- The History News Network
- History of the Second World War: 1939-1945 (French site)
- The New York Public Library Digital Gallery
- Resource listing for WWII
- Third Reich in Ruins
- Wartime Images
- World War II, analyzed!
- World War II in Color
- World War II Plus 55
- Advice Goddess
- Ahistoricality
- Andrew Sullivan
- Balloon Juice
- Hit and Run
- Jesus' General
- Kung Fu Monkey
- Majikthise
- Normblog
- Orcinus
- The Politburo Diktat
- The Poor Man Institute
- Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
- Sadly, No!
- Some Ramblings from Mr. Gueguen
- Grand Rounds (Medicine)
- The History Carnival
- The Skeptics' Circle
- Tangled Bank (Science)
- American Association for the Advancement of Science
- American Association for Cancer Research
- American College of Surgeons
- American Society of Breast Surgeons
- American Society of Clinical Oncology
- Association for Academic Surgery
- The Society of Surgical Oncology
- Society of University Surgeons
Science
Skepticism and critical thinking
Combatting Holocaust denial
History
Politics & current events
Blog carnivals
Science and Surgery
Subscribe via Email
Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.
« The Dawkins-Myers incident: Sometimes it's necessary to break the frame | Main | Death by supplements »
Rush Limbaugh gives Expelled! thumbs up
Category: Anti-Semitism • Entertainment/culture • Evolution • History • Holocaust • Intelligent design/creationism • Movies • Politics • Pseudoscience • Religion • Skepticism/critical thinking
Posted on: March 24, 2008 1:55 PM, by Orac
View the Technorati Link Cosmos for this entry









Comments
Maybe next Ted Haggard will give his approval.
Posted by: Rev. BigDumbChimp | March 24, 2008 2:33 PM
Where does it state in evolutionary theory that there is no god? All I'm familiar with is the fact that there is no evidence of god. There is nothing showing that a supreme creator (regardless of gender) was in any way instrumental in our world.
In response to Rush I can say only this. I hate (as in me personally) fundies or even the strongly religious (read bullies) because I was persecuted for questioning faith. So I can understand that a prof who rabidly preaches (sans evidence) that all we see was created by god (not allah or jahova) he or she gets booted out. If your doing it based on evidence free think then you actually have to preach all sides or it's bigotry. Now if we want all biology to be pointlessly explained by "The Great (insert chosen name) said it shall be so, and it was" by all means admit it and we can move on.
P.S. Rush need to learn the difference between religion and faith. Religion and all science are mortal enemies. Faith and science can easily co-exist in the rational mind.
Posted by: vlad | March 24, 2008 2:40 PM
"Faith and science can easily co-exist in the rational mind." As soon as science disproves an article of faith then that faith must be abandoned or it isn't a rational mind.
Posted by: vlad | March 24, 2008 2:45 PM
Well, at least Ted Haggard is completely heterosexual.
Posted by: Hans | March 24, 2008 2:46 PM
It sounds like Expelled (or at least the parts dealing with the Holocaust) is one long argument from consequences. In other words, they don't claim, "Evolution didn't happen, and here's why not," but that "teaching evolution is dangerous." Not only is this a fallacy, but there is no case to be made that so-called Darwinism leads to all these social ills. It strikes me as a manipulative appeal to emotion.
Posted by: ShellyD99 | March 24, 2008 2:47 PM
Well, at least Ted Haggard is completely heterosexual.
Posted by: Hans | March 24, 2008 2:47 PM
Yes, vlad, as someone who has been studying evolutionary biology for lo these past 20 years, I'm dismayed to discover that I completely missed this bit:
.Darwinazi says: "NO GOD FOR YOU!"
Keep digging, boys. With the god-talk that has permeated this film's publicity, the rickety 'it's not a religion, it's a science!' pedestal upon which ID currently stands will disintegrate faster than through any blows we could have administered ourselves.
Posted by: DanioPhD | March 24, 2008 2:52 PM
In keeping with the paradigm, of communicating so the other side can understand you, it is important to point out, in the best ID Creationist style, that Rush does say that Ben ..."blew him"...
Not that that's wrong...
Posted by: J-Dog | March 24, 2008 2:58 PM
I clicked that link and it took me almost a minute to stop laughing just looking at the header image. It says "Rush is a massive &*^*$ beyond all &*^*$" more than words ever could. What says, "I care about people and my opinions matter" more than a picture of oneself in an expensive suit smoking a fat cigar. He's like walking evidence for Freudian theory.
Once I finally got to the article, the laughter began again. Leftists are afraid of God eh? So does that mean leftists are better god-fearing christians than the Christian Right?
I admit I'm drawing from the cruel and bitter well but part of me can't help but imagine when Rush finally croaks from his smoking, drug-abusing, fat-sucking lifestyle and his last moments pass alone and unloved after his promotion of the family somehow prevented him from (thankfully) never reproducing and divorcing several times.
Posted by: Patrick | March 24, 2008 3:08 PM
Haven't you all heard? It's all the rage: argumentum ad Nazium.
Posted by: fontinalis | March 24, 2008 3:15 PM
That's not praise, we all know where he keeps that thumb.
Posted by: mdhatter | March 24, 2008 3:25 PM
Ad nazium and ad nausium are sooo close! And so similar in their effect.
Posted by: Yojimbo | March 24, 2008 5:49 PM
I am most annoyed by the trailer when Big Ben states something to the effect; "I beleive in a loving god that created everything, rocks, animals and you and I"
Pardon if I misquote a bit.
The he goes on to state that the "Others" believe the everthing is the result of a random act etc. etc.
Whether or not you beleive in a supreme creator or you believe we and all that we see is a random act of biological and astronomical chance; is it not still as remarkable and fascinating?
As Vlad accurately points out "Where does it state in evolutionary theory that there is no god?".
Grow up Ben, for gods sake just be thankful that you are able to appreciate the vast complexity of it all - then again maybe Ben doesn't appreciate complexity? If all of us do not see the same color sky that Ben does are we less of a human being than he is? Ultimately, who ends up throwing rocks and trying to kill each other; the one that believes in the supreme being or the one that believes that we are all part of an amazing act of chance. Seems like history will support the the premise that it is the Social dominators and hyper religious god centered bipeds that are the ones that react to non conformity with destruction.
Seems kinda jack boot supreme on his part...
Posted by: Uncle Dave | March 24, 2008 6:22 PM
I am most annoyed by the trailer when Big Ben states something to the effect; "I beleive in a loving god that created everything, rocks, animals and you and I"
Pardon if I misquote a bit.
The he goes on to state that the "Others" believe the everthing is the result of a random act etc. etc.
Whether or not you beleive in a supreme creator or you believe we and all that we see is a random act of biological and astronomical chance; is it not still as remarkable and fascinating?
Grow up Ben, for gods sake just try and appreciate the vast complexity of it all - then again maybe Ben doesn't appreciate the complexity? If all of us do not see the same color sky that Ben does are we less of a human being than he is? Ultimately, who ends up throwing rocks and trying to kill each other; the one that believes in the supreme being or the one that believes that we are all part of an amazing act of chance. Seems like history will support the the premise that it is the Social dominators and hyper religious god centered bipeds that are the ones that react to non conformity with destruction.
Seems kinda jack boot supreme on his part...
Posted by: Uncle Dave | March 24, 2008 6:24 PM
"This from some professor either in the UK, I forget where it was". Priceless...poor Dawkins. Also terrible English.
I find his god rather small and dull actually. The only thing it seems to threaten these days is freedom and equality in America.
Posted by: Richard Eis | March 24, 2008 7:04 PM
Now remember, our favorite concern troll/energy creature who we will not name thinks that Rush Limbaugh is more moral than PZ Myers. Don't go to Concern Troll's website any more, even to mock him. If he was interested in listening to reason, he wouldn't be doing what he's doing. Instead, you must starve him of his clicks and attention. Period.
Posted by: Phoenix Woman | March 24, 2008 10:48 PM
"... The condescension and the arrogance these people have,... We, on the other hand, recognize that our greatness, who we are, our potential, our ambition, our desire, comes from God, and as part of our Creation, this natural yearning to be free and to practice liberty. That is how we think this country came to be great."
Must start buying irony meters in bulk, just exploded another one. Rush is shocked, "shocked" he says, that these atheist Darwinist are so condescending and arrogant. Unlike Rush who humbly recognizes that his greatness comes from God. Nope, no arrogance there. What a douche.
Posted by: SteveM | March 25, 2008 9:05 AM
Orac, you're not surprised because Limbaugh has always been clueless on matters involving science.
Which is a pity, because on matters that don't involve science, he can be great fun to listen to. Sometimes it's even more fun than listening to his enemies so consistently misunderstand and misinterpret him.
Posted by: wolfwalker | March 25, 2008 10:52 AM
I agree, wolf. i loved hearing rush talk about how bad drugs were and people that abused pharmaceuticals should be drawn and quartered because that leaves a drain on the people who really NEED that medicine.
And then i liked hearing him confess he had an addiction to an opiate prescription medication.
Great fun.
Or were you not being sarcastic?
Posted by: genewitch | March 26, 2008 7:49 AM
Here's a question: Do Rush Limbaugh and Ben Stein *actually* believe that ID is good science? or that evolution is not? Is it possible that Rush is really a bible thumping Jesus freak? Is Ben Stein really guided more by faith than by reason? Is it just a coincidence that this film is released during an election year?
OR, is this whole "Expelled" nonsense really about rallying the faithful behind the GOP? The GOP loves a polarizing issue like this. Is it possible that Ben Stein actually cares about this issue, or is he really involved in an effort to pander to the religious right, and get them rallied behind a dopey issue to trump all others?
Posted by: Clydicus | March 26, 2008 4:21 PM
So did God(s) bless thrice divorced Rush when he went to the Dominican Republic with a Viagra prescription?
Posted by: khan | March 26, 2008 9:41 PM
What the I.D. crowd won't acknowledge is that the elephant in the room is that all I.D. is assigning supernatural magic for unexplained phenomenon. That does nothing more than encourage laziness.
Posted by: Artistradio | March 27, 2008 12:21 AM
Clydicus, I can't speak for Stein, but I think Limbaugh is just a simpleton on matters of science, and makes the mistake of thinking about everything in political terms. I think he truly doesn't understand evolution, and therefore doesn't know how stupid the IDers' arguments are.
Posted by: wolfwalker | March 28, 2008 9:25 PM
Limbaugh and his understanding of science anecdote:
Many many years ago I was trying to rest at my parents' house during a visit. Unfortunately, the time I decided to rest was when Limbaugh was on, and my dad had the radio show piped throughout the entire house. I got to listen to him pontificate on how it was stupid to worry about cutting down trees. He did not understand why clear cutting was a problem.
That was within a week of a highway in British Columbia being covered by a landslide... caused by mud sliding down from a hill that was recently clear cut.
My dad agreed with Limbaugh... until a forest fire burned down several acres of trees in the mountain behind his property (it borders on a national forest). Later with rains causing landslides, and the creek flooding his back yard with mud did he realize the importance of forests, plants and roots on moderating the effects of rainfall.
Posted by: HCN | March 29, 2008 2:02 AM