Seed Media Group

Respectful Insolence

"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." The miscellaneous ramblings of a surgeon/scientist on medicine,
quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him)

Search this blog

Who (or what) is Orac?

orac.jpg Orac is the nom de blog of a humble pseudonymous surgeon/scientist with an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his miscellaneous verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few will. (Continued here, along with a DISCLAIMER that you should read before reading any medical discussions here.)

Orac's old Blog is archived at Archived Insolence.

finalist2007_150x100.jpg

medicalhealth150.jpg

68873033_8fcf1a7ec7_o.jpgAdd to Technorati Favorites!

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Non-Orac Insolence

Blakes 7 crew

Orac sometimes travels with




Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Be afraid, be very, very afraid, people of Butler County, PA... | Main | When popularity outpaces science in surgery »

Geez, give a guy tenure...

Category: BiologyEvolutionScience
Posted on: May 7, 2008 6:00 PM, by Orac

...and suddenly he reveals his true stripes.

Oh, well, at least the Hitler Zombie hasn't eaten Jason's brain, as he has so many of the others who complain about being Expelled!

Yet.

Thanks, Jason. I needed the laugh after the events of yesterday and today. Oh, and congratulations on getting tenure!

Comments

Off point completely, but since this blog hasn't generated much discussion, thought you might be interested in a blog at Overlawyered.com

"Seidel subpoena aftermath
By
Walter Olson
on May 8, 2008 12:01 AM |

As a judge considers whether to impose sanctions on attorney Clifford Shoemaker for hitting investigative blogger Kathleen Seidel with an intimidating subpoena, one of Shoemaker's attorneys asks the court for more time "to gather the material I would need to show the Court the justification for the Subpoena and its scope," which prompts Eric Turkewitz to wonder (May 6): "Why is it necessary to look for justification for the subpoena after it was issued?" And: "Other than talking to Shoemaker, who must have already had justification before the subpoena was issued, why would it be necessary to interview any other witness? It's only Shoemaker's rationale that matters to the sanctions motion."

In another indication that heavy-handed pursuit of a blogger might not have worked out very well as a legal strategy, Shoemaker's own clients, the Sykes family, have now voluntarily dropped their vaccine-autism suit against Bayer, which was the basis for the subpoena (Seidel, Orac)."

So, it ain't over, yet.

Posted by: wfjag | May 8, 2008 3:58 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Spam filters are in place and may hold your comment up for moderation if certain parameters are met. Consequently, your comment may not appear immediately. Blame the comment spammers for this. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com