Now on ScienceBlogs: The Galaxy's Biggest Valentine

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Respectful Insolence

"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." The miscellaneous ramblings of a surgeon/scientist on medicine, quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him)

Who (or what) is Orac?

orac.jpg Orac is the nom de blog of a (not so) humble pseudonymous surgeon/scientist with an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his miscellaneous verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few will. (Continued here, along with a DISCLAIMER that you should read before reading any medical discussions here.)

Orac's old Blog is archived at Archived Insolence.



Add to Technorati Favorites

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Submit to Skeptical Blog Anthology 2009
award_lr.gif
Winner, Best Health Policies/Ethics Weblog of 2008


The 2008 Weblog Awards

skepchick2008top10.jpg


evolution.gif

Archives

Non-Orac Insolence

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences
finalist2007_150x100.jpg
medicalhealth150.jpg
2005 Weblog Award

« Good media, bad media | Main | Two actors and their woo »

Did Larry King learn his lesson?

Category: Alternative medicineAntivaccination lunacyAutismEntertainment/cultureMedicinePopular cultureQuackeryTelevision
Posted on: December 21, 2008 10:10 AM, by Orac

As much as I'd love to take credit, the postponement of the appearance of Jenny McCarthy and J.B. Handley on Larry King Live! originally scheduled for last night had nothing to do with me. Really. The cancellation was apparently announced shortly after my post appeared, leaving no time for it to have had an effect. Heck, for all I know the cancellation had occurred before I posted and I just hadn't noticed.

Despite all the insinuations of dire conspiracies in the comments of the Age of Autism post on the cancellation, it's far more likely that Larry King probably just didn't want to work on the Saturday before Christmas than that big pharma stretched out its dark arm and crushed this "threat" to its dominance. Of course, that Larry King substituted a rerun with that queen of breast cancer, "bioidentical hormone," and now stem cell woo, Suzanne Somers, strongly implies that no lesson has been learned. On the other hand, perhaps Somers' substitution for Jenny McCarthy is an unintentional admission that both are boosting equally bogus medical information and even outright quackery.

In any case, since the antivaccine side is no doubt deluging Larry King's guests e-mail with complaints and requests that McCarthy and Handley be rescheduled, I thought I should do my little part and request my readers to join in on the reality-based side and either (1) request that no guests pushing antivaccination nonsense and autism quackery be given a forum to promote their views; (2) that reality-based celebrities like Amanda Peet be invited instead; or (3) both. Send your e-mails to Larry King Guests.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Medicine & Health

Comments

1

Larry King and the Fox News crew are why I believe that "your IQ must be this high to have a TV show" policies should be mandated by networks.

Posted by: I am so wise | December 21, 2008 11:03 AM

2

". . . on the Saturday before Thanksgiving. . ."

Surely you mean "on the Saturday before Christmas."

If there was any doubt, CNN's recent dismal dismissing of reporters or hosts with any abilities with scientific subjects shows that they have truly moved away from their centrist roots.

Posted by: sirhcton | December 21, 2008 12:23 PM

3

Done. Obviously, the option most palatable to the show runners will be #3 and so that's the one I hawked.

Posted by: Strider | December 21, 2008 3:39 PM

4

Done. I focused on the risk of outbreaks as vaccination rates drop.

Posted by: Kathryn | December 21, 2008 5:43 PM

5

Right. polite email suggesting a panel including Amanda Peet and Paul Offit in place of JB and Jenny.

Posted by: DLC | December 21, 2008 7:32 PM

6
...that big pharma stretched out its dark arm and crushed this "threat" to its dominance.

I find the quote marks around "threat" to be strange. After all, the quacks do, indeed, pose a dire threat in general.

Posted by: Michael Suttkus, II | December 21, 2008 7:40 PM

7

Like DLC, I suggested a panel of people who know what they are talking about and use science. With Obama appointing science based people, it appears that we may just be entering a "golden age" (yes, I am wishing) of science. I suggested that Larry King either get on board, or, he will be left in the station.

Posted by: FreeSpeaker | December 22, 2008 9:37 AM

8

yay reality

Posted by: john ilya | December 22, 2008 8:54 PM

9

Good, we won't have to listen to pro-mercury Paul Offit or Amanda Peet speak.

Posted by: pharmabuster | December 22, 2008 9:15 PM

10
Good, we won't have to listen to pro-mercury Paul Offit or Amanda Peet speak.

2005 called. It wants its meme back.

Seriously, didn't you get the memo? You're supposed to be hammering on "too much, too soon" now because the mercury thing is a non-starter.

Posted by: Joseph C. | December 23, 2008 1:07 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)











ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.