Now on ScienceBlogs: The Festival Recognizes Our First "Featured Fan"!

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Respectful Insolence

"A statement of fact cannot be insolent." The miscellaneous ramblings of a surgeon/scientist on medicine, quackery, science, pseudoscience, history, and pseudohistory (and anything else that interests him)

Who (or what) is Orac?

orac.jpg Orac is the nom de blog of a (not so) humble pseudonymous surgeon/scientist with an ego just big enough to delude himself that someone, somewhere might actually give a rodent's posterior about his miscellaneous verbal meanderings, but just barely small enough to admit to himself that few will. (Continued here, along with a DISCLAIMER that you should read before reading any medical discussions here.)

Orac's old Blog is archived at Archived Insolence.



Add to Technorati Favorites

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Submit to Skeptical Blog Anthology 2009
award_lr.gif
Winner, Best Health Policies/Ethics Weblog of 2008


The 2008 Weblog Awards

skepchick2008top10.jpg


evolution.gif

Archives

Non-Orac Insolence

Wikio - Top Blogs - Sciences
finalist2007_150x100.jpg
medicalhealth150.jpg
2005 Weblog Award

« The last Skeptics' Circle of 2008... | Main | Taking woo in the military to a whole new level: Deploying acupuncturists to Iraq »

Santa Claus will take you to hell...the video

Category: PoliticsReligion
Posted on: December 14, 2008 11:07 AM, by Orac

The other day, I mentioned how the ever-warped and evil Westboro Baptist Church wanted in on the Washington State melee in which every religious and antireligion group out there is trying to get a display at the capitol after the state allowed a Christian Nativity scene. Included were the lyrics to a lovely jingle these twisted idiots came up with called Santa Claus Will Take You To Hell.

Ed Brayton may have posted an image of the actual poster that the WBC wanted to display and reported that the State of Washington, deluged with requests for displays, has declared a moratorium on new displays until the government can figure out what to do, but I've gone one better. Here's the video of Fred Phelps' cult of hateful loonies actually singing the song:

It doesn't have a good beat, and you can't dance to it, as evidenced near the end of the video by the clumsy attempt at a chorus line.

This time around, I don't know whether to laugh or to cry. I realize the WBC is an easy target, but it's an easy target because it's about as good an example as there exists for just how badly radical fundamentalist religion can warp people.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: Politics

Comments

1

This video would be hilarious - if they didn't involve kids in their madness.

Posted by: sophia8 | December 14, 2008 11:54 AM

2

If it makes you feel better, even right-wing individuals such as Bill O'Reilly think that the WBC is crazy and should not be allowed to display their sign.

Posted by: Randall | December 14, 2008 11:57 AM

3

The only reason the kickline doesn't work is they're kicking on the downbeat. They should be stepping on the downbeat and kicking on the upbeat.

I really like the triplets they added in, actually, and think they articulated them well. I just might cover this song in concert, albeit ironically.

Posted by: Andrew | December 14, 2008 12:13 PM

4

Where do they get this bizarre idea that Santa would want to rape kids?

Posted by: J. J. Ramsey | December 14, 2008 12:28 PM

5

What is the "Westboro Baptist Church"? They don't sound like any Baptists I know.

Posted by: Marilyn Mann | December 14, 2008 1:01 PM

6

Never mind, I just googled them. They are a bunch of wackos of a particularly loathsome variety.

Posted by: Marilyn Mann | December 14, 2008 1:10 PM

7
Where do they get this bizarre idea that Santa would want to rape kids?

It's all made up, of course. They're just looking to stir trouble up by attaching their protests to whatever is convenient at the time. There's no real logic to it. The scam is that they're a family of mostly lawyers, know the law pretty well, and they hope to sue and cash in every time their 1st Amendment rights are violated.


Posted by: Joseph C. | December 14, 2008 1:58 PM

8

I really must protest this assertion. In my opinion, wearing an explosive device and detonating it in a crowd of innocent women and children is far, far more warped than anything Phelps and his inbred coterie do. Phelps & Co are hypocrites, in my opinion, for not taking up the sword and emulating their much more sincere brethren in this manner.

Even if we exclude actual violence, WBC is a good example, certainly, but nothing like the best. That fellow who spent forty years on top of a pole naked a ways back, he was WAY nuttier than these idiots. And that's just one example.

M

Posted by: MarcW | December 14, 2008 2:00 PM

9

This is child abuse...

Posted by: LL | December 14, 2008 2:14 PM

10

MarcW, I'm with you. Islamic fundamentalists might be nuts, but you definitely can't call them hypocrites.

The WBC really should just give a shot at holy wrath and attempt to slaughter all of the non-believers. That's what god calls for much of the time in the bible (my favorite example of this is Hosea 13:16). Then they could get to meet some of the friends of the soldiers in caskets that they seem so overjoyed about.

There are nuttier people, to be sure, but these are some of the nuttiest stateside.

Posted by: JStein | December 14, 2008 3:02 PM

11
even right-wing individuals such as Bill O'Reilly think that the WBC is crazy and should not be allowed to display their sign.

Hardly surprising if you think about it.

For one, O'Reilly is opposed to anyone other than those who agree with him being allowed to express themselves. WBC is just unusual in being to the right of him instead of to the left like almost everyone else.

For another, WBC does an excellent job of illustrating just how far into batshit country O'Reilly's positions really are. Let's give him credit for understanding the negative PR potential.

Posted by: D. C. Sessions | December 14, 2008 3:04 PM

12

"you tell the children he is real
you know that's just a lie
to justify your own vile sins
is the only reason why"

do i detect a whiff of projection?

Posted by: Michael Fridman | December 14, 2008 4:28 PM

13

You know, I've never been one to claim that religious indoctrination is even akin to child abuse, in spite of my own lingering scars from childhood indoctrination. But if this doesn't qualify, I really don't know what would, shy of physically beating them.

Posted by: DuWayne | December 14, 2008 5:26 PM

14

DuWayne, if you haven't read the article about Phelp's son, Nate Phelps, I think you should

Running from hell -
Growing up in America's most hated family

Of course, that story line is a bit of hyperbole. No one outside Kansas knew of the Phelps back when Nate grew up.

Posted by: Kristjan Wager | December 14, 2008 5:40 PM

15

I thought it was catchy. >_>

Posted by: Danny | December 14, 2008 5:41 PM

16

When I first saw that poster, I speculated that someone not related to the WBC had submitted it as a joke. But holy crap, it's real! That group is living proof of Poe's law.

Posted by: Cath the Canberra Cook | December 14, 2008 6:03 PM

17

Even Bill Donohue castigated them for being "Anti-Catholic, Anti-gay."

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | December 14, 2008 6:36 PM

18

Are you sure that's not a parody done by atheists?

Posted by: Tsu Dho Nimh | December 14, 2008 7:59 PM

19

Kristjan -

I haven't read that article, but I did hear an interview of Nate on NPR (I want to say it was Fresh Air).

Tsu Dho Nimh -

All too certain. Phelps is infamous for this kind of vile garbage.

Posted by: DuWayne | December 14, 2008 8:12 PM

20

Do they end all their music videos with some brainwashed child parroting one of their hate slogans? I'm curious because I've seen them do that before.

Posted by: The Science Pundit | December 14, 2008 10:39 PM

21

I like the way that they're overwhelmed so they've frozen accepting NEW displays Now that the christians are in the door, etc.

Posted by: Marcus Ranum | December 15, 2008 12:02 AM

22

@MarcW: I don't know, a case could be made. Orac didn't say that this sort of thing is the worst effect of religion, but "about as good an example as there exists for just how badly radical fundamentalist religion can warp people". Being whipped up into a killing fervor by your religious beliefs (especially as around in-group/out-group and tribalist/nationalist sentiment) is bad, and has deplorable effects, but it's the sort of things humans are very prone to and aren't that hard to push in to. This kind of bizarre exhibitionism, on the other hand, is arguably weirder and an example of a greater warping of minds than "those people are bad and it is virtuous to kill them".

Posted by: Morgan | December 15, 2008 5:54 AM

23

Why don't they just ditch the protest stunts and concentrate full-time on the parody? It's much funnier, and they can even sing in tune, which is more than most people in Christmas church services will manage.

...What's that you say? They're not doing this as comedy?

Posted by: RedGreenInBlue | December 17, 2008 1:52 PM

24

This is the craziest shit I have ever seen. We should go in and take the kids out of there and give them a chance and put the adults in jail for child abuse.

Posted by: scooter | December 21, 2008 3:47 PM







ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.