Respectful Insolence

Santa Claus a fascist? Say it ain’t so!

With Santa beginning his journey through the world to deliver presents to all the good boys and girls, someone sent me a profoundly disturbing video:

I knew it! I knew it! Santa gives away things; so he must be a liberal. But if you listen to Jonah Goldberg, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh, you know that liberals are all fascists at heart. So it only follows that Santa must be a fascist!

It’s so obvious!

So is saying Merry Christmas to all also fascist? Who cares? Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Comments

  1. #1 chemgeek
    December 25, 2009

    Merry Christmas to you. Thanks for another year of superb insolence.

  2. #2 Greg Fish
    December 25, 2009

    But if you listen to Jonah Goldberg, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh, you know that liberals are all fascists at heart.

    Fascist? They keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.

  3. #3 Sid Offit
    December 25, 2009

    Orac, get some sleep. Merry Christmas and Happy Festivus to all and to all a good night.

  4. #4 Romeo Vitelli
    December 25, 2009

    Considering that vast forced labour camp that he ran at the North Pole for elves making toys, what else could he be but a fascist?

  5. #5 Thomas
    December 25, 2009

    Merry Christmas is a socialist codeword for Sieg Heil.

  6. #6 eddie
    December 25, 2009

    dood! Awesome crackle fx on the sound. How u doo that?

    Hehe merry wossname 2 u @ll

  7. #7 d
    December 25, 2009

    Well, I think technically liberals are called fascists by the VRWC because they give other peoples’ stuff (usually money money) away. Since Santa is giving away toys that are made in his workshop he isn’t a liberal (necessarily) or a fascist. Now, whether he is a slaver is a different question.

  8. #8 DLC
    December 26, 2009

    And a Happy Christmas to All, and to all a good night!

  9. #9 Chris
    December 27, 2009

    He sees you when you’re sleeping, he knows when you’re awake. Obviously a totalitarian surveillance state.

  10. #10 Justthisguy
    January 7, 2010

    @ Greg Fish: It means _exactly_ what they think it means. That is, the rich guys (Goldman-Sachs, George Soros, Dee-fense corntractors, etc.) still get to make money, but only in partnership with the State, and the poor guys stay in their place, because actual conflict between the classes would disrupt things too much. Sorta like what the O-hole and his bi-coastal-elite buddies and fellow Chicago criminals have in mind for us.

  11. #11 Joram Arentved
    December 16, 2011

    The Truth is always A Much Better Future than that money ideal, God’s
    ‘IT’ Hobby That gives me no idea, whatsoever that I can feel like being against myself being ‘just’ myself, note: Whatever God exists or not, maybe A Fascist, my good news is still a symbol & a repetition of my fact that I do well to ‘testify’ to being happy to exist as an honest man, i.e. more honesty, more future that only The Corrupt right now get away with the fact that They can’t accept, till it’s too late, so I can find out & so on, greetings, ‘J.A.,’ guitartie@yahoo.ie, ‘Merry Present
    Time’ etc.

  12. #12 Chris
    December 16, 2011

    This necromancer makes absolutely no sense!

The site is undergoing maintenance presently. Commenting has been disabled. Please check back later!