Why didn't I think of this before?

Damn. Every so often another blogger will think of something that I really, really wished I'd thought of before. Times like this, and this handy-dandy alternative medicine flow chart.

I do think he missed one thing, though. Just because someone doesn't like having stuff shoved up their posterior doesn't mean they won't be into "detox." Colonic irrigation is part of many "detox" regimens. Of course, much woo overlaps; so you can't make any hard and fast rules. Consider this chart a guide instead.

More like this

Every MD and ER bay should have one of these on the wall. I am going to show this to my doctor the next time I see them.

By Militant Agnostic (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

Reminds a bit of one of those what's-the-differnece-between jokes:

Q: What's the difference between depression and dysentery?

A: Depresssion is when it feels like the bottom has dropped out of your world, dysentery is when it feels like the world has dropped out of your bottom.

By Didaktylos (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

It's priceless!!!!(" A bloke with wings, in a white frock")I wish he had included diet woo: " Let your food be your medicine"; " You are what you eat". Here is some.. er, food for thought : veganism, organics, raw foods, Ayurvedic dosha-typed diet, Taoist 5 element, macrobiotics, the Paleolithic diet, blood-type diets, ultra low carb, Ornish, powdered protein/ dried vegetables & fruits, raw milk, yoghurt fetishism.....then there's water as panacaea.

By Denice Walter (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

I liked "Flap eared royal fruitcake" as a level of insanity.

By Militant Agnostic (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

My favourite bit was on the "God" branch: "Can you be arsed to actually do anything?"

I've always wanted to see the opinions of a woo practitioner in one field about the others. Can they all work? Do naturopaths think that ear candling works? Do acupuncturists think that homeopathy is a crock?
Let's have what they really think about the others. They can't think that all the other modalities work because that would decrease the effectiveness of their own delusion.

By natural cynic (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

I've always wanted to see the opinions of a woo practitioner in one field about the others. Can they all work? Do naturopaths think that ear candling works? Do acupuncturists think that homeopathy is a crock?
Let's have what they really think about the others.

Of course, they can't say anything. That would break up the cartel and get the customers actually thinking about whether their treatments work. With mutual support, the consumers can move around endlessly among all the fake options and rationalize them all equally. It enhances the profit for all parties and establishes a culture of non-questioning consumers.

I was suprised no one had thought of it yet too.

I had the idea last Wednesday, while the wife was watching some crap on the TV, I googled "Alternative Therapy Flowchart", couldn't find anything relevant, so I knocked the bugger up quick before some annoying git on Science blogs beat me to it.

@ natural cynic and Bronze Dog : I cautiously venture a guess that for the woo-providers who are *not* purely salesmen perhaps they *may* actually accept several "disciplines" of quackademia _because_ the quality of their thought in general is neither very critical nor reality-based. Perhaps "crank magnetism" occurs not because different forms of "bad science" attract each other but because *bad thinking* is at the root all the bad science.

By Denice Walter (not verified) on 17 Oct 2010 #permalink

@ cw The sad part is I know someone who believes and defends crystal healing :(

natural cynic #8 wrote:

Let's have what they really think about the others. They can't think that all the other modalities work because that would decrease the effectiveness of their own delusion.

People who endorse So-Called Alternative Medicine seem to see the lack of internal criticism as a feature, not a bug. It presumably shows how accepting and gentle these therapies are, how concerned they are with the individual.

Apparently they can all work for different people, at different times, and there is no need to try to force our own way into to being the only Right way -- the way scientific medicine so rudely does. You have to find the one that's right for you. Which is mine, when I have your attention.

The model is less like science, and more like religion -- the kind where there are many paths to the same Truth. I suspect that a panel filled with competing alt med theorists would sound far more like an ecumenical interfaith alliance council than a debate. Competition bad. It's too "judgmental." Too much like that judgmental Evil Cabal of Mainstream Atheist Reductionist Materialist Scientists.

"The model is less like science, and more like religion"
You have that right.
Crispian how about a religious flow chart too?
monotheist but really wants to be polytheist - catholic etc.

To be fair, for many muscle-based complaints, hands-on approaches (cranio-sacral, massage, etc) do help in so far as they promote relaxation of the affected muscles. It's also how I learned to tolerate touch.

His subway map of science is pretty damn cool too - bravo.

I liked that "Flap eared royal fruitcake," by its positioning, seemed to me like it were given as the lower of the levels of crazy options. And if a "Flap eared royal fruitcake" level of crazy sounds sane compared to yours, that's a bad sign.

Did anyone else do the, well, if I were looking to choose a form of alternative medicine, where would the flow chart lead me, thing? I ended up on Rolfing, with which I was previously unfamiliar. Oh my.