Now on ScienceBlogs: Q: How do you sex a Smilodon? (A: Very carefully)

Seed Media Group

Integrity of Science

The Integrity of Science Blog provides commentary and highlights news on attacks and misuse of science, particularly as it relates to water, climate change, and environmental security.

About the Author

Pacific Institute Founded in 1987 and based in Oakland, California the Pacific Institute is an independent, nonpartisan think-tank studying issues at the intersection of development, environment, and security.

The Institute´s Integrity of Science Initiative responds to and counters the assault on science and scientific integrity in the public policy arena, especially on issues related to water, climate change, and security.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll & Links

Science Integrity-Related Blogs Links

Did You Know?

While the Pacific Institute's Integrity of Science Program is only a little over a year old, the Pacific Institute is celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2007.

« Gore School Ban Follow-up | Main | White House Staying the Course on Climate Change »

White House "historic shift" imminent? Call us skeptical

Posted on: January 16, 2007 11:14 AM, by Ian Hart

According to sources close to Prime Minister Tony Blair, President Bush is going to be signaling a "historic shift" on his administration's climate change policy during next Tuesday's State of the Union speech. According to The Observer

Bush and Blair held private talks on climate change before Christmas, and there is a feeling that the US President will now agree a cap on emissions in the US, meaning that, for the first time, American industry and consumers would be expected to start conserving energy and curbing pollution.

'We could now be seeing the beginning of a consensus on a post-Kyoto framework,' said a source close to the prime minister. 'President Bush is beginning to talk about more radical measures.'

We're skeptical. Starting with his pledge to regulate CO2 as a pollutant during the 2000 election campaign, Bush has cried "wolf!" repeatedly.

Greenpeace USA research director Kurt Davies echoes this sentiment in the Observer piece:


'The sands are clearly shifting on climate change for this administration, but there has to be a concrete follow-up,' he said. 'We were shocked last year when he talked about the US being addicted to oil, but then there was no follow-up to that.'

Frankly, our skepticism is grounded in more recent Administration policy statements. Last week's much anticipated 'major shift on Iraq' was a marginal step in the same direction. Will this be more of the same? Tune in next Tuesday.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/30686

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM