Now on ScienceBlogs: Rhodes Secretary: Wall Street Megabonuses Draining Our Young Talent

Seed Media Group

Collective Imagination

Integrity of Science

The Integrity of Science Blog provides commentary and highlights news on attacks and misuse of science, particularly as it relates to water, climate change, and environmental security.

About the Author

Pacific Institute Founded in 1987 and based in Oakland, California the Pacific Institute is an independent, nonpartisan think-tank studying issues at the intersection of development, environment, and security.

The Institute´s Integrity of Science Initiative responds to and counters the assault on science and scientific integrity in the public policy arena, especially on issues related to water, climate change, and security.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll & Links

Science Integrity-Related Blogs Links

Did You Know?

While the Pacific Institute's Integrity of Science Program is only a little over a year old, the Pacific Institute is celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2007.

« A Cynical Morning Cartoon with Flamy McGassy | Main | A Blueprint for Reconciling Faith and Science? »

Bad News, Bears

Category: Think Tanks
Posted on: July 2, 2007 12:44 PM, by Ian Hart

Would the oil and gas industry underwrite research that makes the plight of the polar bear seem, well, less dire? Does a polar bear swim in the Arctic? From NewScientist:

Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and his colleagues question whether polar bear populations really are declining and if sea ice, on which the animals hunt, will actually disappear as quickly as climate models predict (Ecological Complexity, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2007.03.002). Soon, who receives funding for this and other work from Exxon-Mobil, has been attacking climate change science for several years. Three of the six other authors also have links to the oil industry.

If the polar bears' habitat disappears later than predicted, is that a valid excuse to delay implementing a solution? How does this study jibe with the ExxonMobil Foundation's s biodiversity efforts ("Protect Tomorrow. Today")?

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/44628

Comments

1

Since the Earth existed, there is a constant battle for the survival of the species. And this battle always existed.

Still, now it seems that global warming puts a big pressure on certain species. The human specie is lucky for now, we can survive the drastic climatic change, but we cannot ignore the fact that we are the only ones that can do something about it and protect the other species.

This is both a big responsability, but also a big challenge. If we continue talking about cars and energy, we will miss the point: oceans and the sun influence climate the most. www.1ocean-1climate.com presents an interesting theory about how we should first take care of the oceans in order to prevent climate changes.

Posted by: Adrianne | July 2, 2007 2:37 PM

2

Blogspammer. I sure get tired of this hokum post, it shows up on climate sites everywhere, usually over the same "Adrianne" name, always flogging the same weird notion with no math behind it. They have about a dozen different website names, which gets them past the filters.

Posted by: Hank Roberts | July 22, 2007 10:26 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Enter to win a free copy of The Monty Hall Problem
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM