In a nutshell:
"This administration's political appointees might be unique in their contempt for government scientists and the empiric process that shapes their work."
Read "Frog by frog." Hat-tip to Michael Halpern
Now on ScienceBlogs: The Australian's War on Science 41
The Integrity of Science Blog provides commentary and highlights news on attacks and misuse of science, particularly as it relates to water, climate change, and environmental security.
Founded in 1987 and based in Oakland, California the Pacific Institute is an independent, nonpartisan think-tank studying issues at the intersection of development, environment, and security.
The Institute´s Integrity of Science Initiative responds to and counters the assault on science and scientific integrity in the public policy arena, especially on issues related to water, climate change, and security.
While the Pacific Institute's Integrity of Science Program is only a little over a year old, the Pacific Institute is celebrating its 20th anniversary in 2007.
« Surgeon General: Attacking the Messenger | Main | 'Truth' wins UCS 'Science Idol' Contest »
Category: White House
Posted on: July 26, 2007 9:53 AM, by Ian Hart
In a nutshell:
"This administration's political appointees might be unique in their contempt for government scientists and the empiric process that shapes their work."
Read "Frog by frog." Hat-tip to Michael Halpern
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/46578
Comments
That's good. Could be shorter and perhaps sharper, however:
This administration might be unique in its contempt for scientists and the empiric process that shapes their work.
Or just:
This administration might be unique in its contempt.
I'm tempted to replace the "might be" with "is" but will leave that debate to the historians.
Posted by: blf | July 26, 2007 11:09 AM