Comments for Integrity of Science

Comment on Administration Testimony: One + One Still = Three by Vikas

Vikas — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:55:35 +0000

Click on the link below to get Best Administrative Jobs.

Comment on That’s All, Folks by Chris

Chris — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:37:45 +0000

Darwin did not have the blessing of having electron microscopes that we have today. Darwin himself said “if it can be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possible have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down”. (Origin of Species) 1872 p. 154.
What you see above is the nail in the coffin for the Darwinian evolutionary theory. A recent email from an evolutionist said ” I am asking you to not look around at all the different species now present, but for the fun of it go back to a time when a simple cell miscodes and starts a new direction.” There is a problem with this, you cannot back to when the cell was simple that time does not exist!! The cell from the very start has been complex and there simply is no evidence that ever shows a time when the cell was anything but complex!
Life in all aspects of it, when properly studied reveals that there is simply nothing simple about life. From the tiniest cell (which by the way you are made up of billions of) to the complex galaxy and even further the universe in which we exist is absolutely, mind blowing, unfathomably complex!! How does this level of complexity arise by chance and left to itself. This the evolutionist simply do not have an answer for.

http://www.icr.org/wisdom-of-God/

Check out this website and realize that we are fearfully and wonderfully made… Psalm 139

Comment on Surgeon General: Attacking the Messenger by msnsiz

msnsiz — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:17:52 +0000

The Office of Surgeon General always has been overtly political, a captive Ameritania Hotel New York

of the most hysterical public health activists. Its only real powers are tongue-clucking and finger-wagging, usually about the latest moral panic, lecturing the American public to knock off its bad habits, lest somebody get hurt. Richard msn nickleri

Carmona's tenure was no different, which is why it's laughable to hear him lecture someone else about science.

Comment on Climate Change Joins Sex Ed, Skeptics Net a Win by msnci

msnci — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:15:40 +0000

he old man owned several businesses, Ameritania Hotel New York

two of which ran around the clock. I used to do the daily bank because the owner didn't trust himself with cash, or his son either. The owner had learned all his accounting by rote, taught to msn nickleri

him by others. He taught his son by rote as well.

Comment on That’s All, Folks by John

John — Sat, 01 Sep 2007 23:01:07 +0000

Your blog’s informative is very rich in contents. I like your way of
presentation. At times I disagree with your views but thinking about it who
presents views that are acceptable to everyone. Keep posting your good
blogs.

Comment on Columnist Calls for “Honest Disagreement,” Holds Straight Face by Ken Ott

Ken Ott — Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:30:39 +0000

Good point, Ian, and thank you for shining light in another dark corner. It’s necessary to reveal what these junk science cheerleaders are really advocating.

Cheers.

Comment on One more thing about yesterday’s USA Today article by SMC

SMC — Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:02:51 +0000

This is great! The Mainstream Media™ is now helping to promote a political "War on Science". I'm all in favor of this, of course, as I think it will be great for those of us with a scientific bent. (Yes, this is a shameless plug for a blog post of my own on my poor, lonely little self-hosted blog...)

Comment on Whose playbook are they reading? by Hank Roberts

Hank Roberts — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 12:20:56 +0000

Nitpicking is afundamental primate bonding behavior.
In that spirit, I must ask:

“Who’s” grammar book are you using?

The same one that published your spell-checker. Ed

Comment on A Blueprint for Reconciling Faith and Science? by Don Strong

Don Strong — Wed, 01 Aug 2007 06:12:28 +0000

Newton is remembered for his physics. His contributions to theology and philosophy play second fiddle to contemporaries such as Spinoza, Leibniz, and Hobbes, for example. If not for his highly original and enduring physics, his voluminous theology and philosophy would be all but forgotten except to historians of the Enlightenment. Jacoby cherry picks from N’s theology and fails to illustrate its significance to the history of religous thought. None of the community for which Jacoby is writing this fluff would find much appeal in N’s theology.

Comment on ‘Truth’ wins UCS ‘Science Idol’ Contest by Sound

Sound — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 15:58:47 +0000

Love it.

Truth, give us the truth fed govt as we are on to you.