Seed Media Group

Galactic Interactions

Rob Knop's Blog -- ramblings and rants about astronomy, cosmology, science education, general nerdism, and anything else.

Search this blog

Profile

prospero_galhat_150x200.jpg


Rob Knop earned a PhD in Physics from Caltech in 1997, and did a 5-year post-doc with the Supernova Cosmology Project, and contributed to the discovery of the accelerating Universe. He was an assistant professor of Physics & Astronomy at Vanderbilt for 6 years before scattering out of academia. He now works for Linden Lab, the producers of Second LIfe. (Note: this is not an official site of Linden Lab! Although I work for Linden Lab, all content in this blog is posted without the review or approval of Linden Lab. All statements and opinions expressed here are my own.)

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Blogroll

Other Information

[cc-by-sa]

The contents of each Galactic Interactions post are under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license.

« Phil Plait on the move | Main | The Authoritarian Response? (Reacting too fast to tragedy) (v2.0) »

Two interacting galaxies

Category: Astronomy SciencePretty Pictures
Posted on: April 16, 2007 9:17 PM, by Rob Knop

Here are images of two more galaxies. These weren't taken during the current run, but in a previous run. Last November, I was also down at CTIO with some students. I was doing blazar work on the 1.0m telescope (not to be confused with the 0.9m telescope I'm using right now), and shot off some images of the galaxies that Katie was observing spectroscopically. The two galaxies below are those galaxies.

The first is NGC 1614:

ngc1614.png

This galaxy has what we in the biz call a "disturbed morphology." It's not just a clean spiral galaxy, and it's certainly not an elliptical galaxy. Sticking off down and to the left (to the southwest— yes, i got that right) is a big ol' tidal tail, the smoking gun that tells me that this galaxy is in fact an interacting galaxy. Indeed, this is a major interaction that is well on its way to being a major merger.

The second galaxy, also imaged last November, is ESO 420-G013:

eso420-g013.png

When I show these color images, there has already been some handwaving. I've done a nonlinear conversion of the flux measured into a brightness, and have chosen that conversion in each of the red, green, and blue channels primarily for artistic purposes. In this case, though, in order to highlight the features of interest, I used the Gimp to further process the image to make two additional versions:

eso420-g013-lowlevel.png eso420-g013-sat.png

In the image on the left, I cranked up the nonlinearity to bring out the low-level features. Notice the ringing or banding structure? The galaxy seems to have a "terraced" light distribution. That's another thing that tells me that this galaxy is in fact likely to be an advanced merger of two other galaxies.

On the right, I've cranked up the saturation to enhance the color contrast. There are a number of things to notice here, but the one I want to highlight is right at the nucleus. Notice how the nucleus is a bright red spot, and the brightest spot in blue light is acutally offset to the southwest (down and to the right)? What's going on here is that there is a lot of dust and gas right at the nucleus. Dust blocks light, but it lets through more redder light than bluer light. This is why the sky is always so red right at sunset. Because there's so much dust right at the nucleus of this galaxy, it shows up a lot redder than the other parts around it.

Comments

Neat! Can you offer links to larger images? Much appreciate the little lesson in how to usefully manipulate images to bring out different details.

Posted by: Hank Roberts | April 16, 2007 11:24 PM

The tidal tail in N1614 looks like it is down and to the right, which would be SW in canonically oriented images.

Posted by: Kayhan Gultekin | April 17, 2007 10:28 AM

The tidal tail in N1614 looks like it is down and to the right, which would be SW in canonically oriented images.

Yes. That's what I said :)

-Rob

Posted by: Rob Knpo | April 17, 2007 4:28 PM

No ... you got the SW right, but you say it's pointing to the left when it's pointing to the right. *shrug*.

Posted by: mollishka | April 17, 2007 5:02 PM

Did I say LEFT? Doh. What an idiot I am. Sorry about that.

-Rob

Posted by: Rob Knop | April 17, 2007 6:35 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs