Search this blog
Profile
Rob Knop earned a PhD in Physics from Caltech in 1997, and did a 5-year post-doc with the Supernova Cosmology Project, and contributed to the discovery of the accelerating Universe. He was an assistant professor of Physics & Astronomy at Vanderbilt for 6 years before scattering out of academia. He now works for Linden Lab, the producers of Second LIfe. (Note: this is not an official site of Linden Lab! Although I work for Linden Lab, all content in this blog is posted without the review or approval of Linden Lab. All statements and opinions expressed here are my own.)
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Blogroll
Other Information
The contents of each Galactic Interactions post are under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license.
Science & Religion:
You will frequently hear certain anti-religion science bloggers and commenters on these boards saying that the only way for a non-atheist to be a good scientist is to "compartmentalize"— to wall off a part of his mind while doing science,...
Read on »
Posted on July 18, 2007 1:06 PM • 179 Comments •
So that people don't feel the need to threadcrap in other threads, I open this thread here for people to make their flames, comments, insults, dismissals, expressions of support, and so forth. I have said before that I'm a Christian....
Posted on July 16, 2007 12:35 PM • 46 Comments •
This is from a letter to the editor that was published in The Tennessean about a month ago. In the "Issues" section on Sunday, they had a page devoted to this, and this time they actually published a long (more...
Read on »
Posted on July 9, 2007 8:04 AM • 40 Comments •
Creationists like to take the middle-school definition of the scientific method and read it utterly literally to claim that a lot of science is in fact not "proper" science, because it doesn't fit the cookie-cutter definition of a scientific experiment as we learned in 8th grade. This is, of course, woefully wrong. Evolution is not based in "Faith," but is a legitimate scientific theory in a way that creationism is not.
Read on »
Posted on June 11, 2007 9:30 PM • 23 Comments •
This statement is frequently raised by those who would suggest that there is reason to doubt that evolution happened and gave rise to the species we see today (including us). While this statement is technically true, those who use it use it incorrectly and draw incorrect inferences from it.
Read on »
Posted on June 11, 2007 7:57 PM • 8 Comments •
I'm pretty sure that nowhere in the Bible does it say that the square root of 256 is 16. I happen to know that, yes, 16 squared is 256. Therefore, if I were to tell you and attempt to convince...
Posted on May 27, 2007 7:56 PM • 13 Comments •
To heck with bubble sort, selection sort, insertion sort, and all the rest. Yes, all of those algorithms were intelligently design, but none of them follow the precepts of Intelligent Design. And, now, David Morgan-Mar gives us Intelligent Design Sort....
Posted on May 23, 2007 1:15 PM • 4 Comments •
Intelligent Design is cleverly designed. Much of what I say here will apply to almost any other religious tradition in the modern world. I refer specifically to Christianity for three reasons. First, it's the most dominant religion in the USA,...
Read on »
Posted on May 23, 2007 1:17 AM • 11 Comments •
I'm in an interesting position. Having so recently posted my own bitch and whine about how my tenure case is in trouble, suddenly we learn that Intelligent Design advocate Guillermo Gonzalez-- somebody who, frankly, has been viewed as a thorn...
Read on »
Posted on May 16, 2007 10:40 AM • 14 Comments •
WARNING : no science in this post. Skip it if that will bother you. In this post, I try to explain why I say that I'm a Christian, and what I see as the core of Christian theology.
Read on »
Posted on March 15, 2007 9:10 AM • 176 Comments •