Official Comment Count: 1,031,800

Your Bloggers

chris_sheril%20small.JPG Chris Mooney is a freelance writer and the author of two books, The Republican War on Science and Storm World. For more information see his bio, events, articles, or visit him on Wikipedia and YouTube.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is a marine biologist at Duke University. Sometimes she's a classicist, radio jock, or congressional staffer. Never sure what's next, she continues to enjoy the journey...

Chris & Sheril have a sound track and are currently working on ScienceDebate2008, which they just described in:

ScienceApril11.gif


Chris's Books

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Nature Blog Network

Archives

Search this blog

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« Tropical Storm Dean Spinning Up...Soon to be a Hurricane? | Main | Russia Pretends To Claim The Arctic: They should've known better... »

Understanding Hurricane Speed Limits: The Case of Supertyphoon Sepat

Category: Hurricanes
Posted on: August 15, 2007 9:15 AM, by Chris C. Mooney

MIT hurricane theorist Kerry Emanuel pioneered a mode of analysis known as hurricane maximum potential intensity theory (MPI theory)--essentially, an equation that can calculate the maximum surface wind speed, and the minimum sea level pressure, achievable by a given hurricane in a given climate. I don't understand in intimate detail all the terms in the equation (which you can read here), but I understand in essence what it does. You might say that it calculates a kind of hurricane speed limit.

Obviously, the maximum potential intensity varies by time of year and by area of the globe; but there are a few regions where it is particularly high--and, indeed, where extremely intense hurricanes have been observed. One such area is the Gulf of Mexico; another is the Caribbean. And another still is the region off the eastern coast of the Philippines, where we currently find a powerful supertyphoon that may be on route to becoming the strongest storm yet observed in 2007--Sepat.

Here's an image of Sepat's totally cloudless eye:

Sepat%20August%2015.jpg

And here's an image of Emanuel's real-time maximum potential intensity map for the region (click for higher resolution). In it, you can see the area of dark blue/black off the Philippines where, sure enough, this storm is currently located. According to Emanuel's theory, a storm here--today--can potentially achieve a pressure lower than 890 millibars and a maximum sustained surface wind speed in the range of 77-85 meters per second (roughly 172-190 miles per hour).

MPIwpac.png

There's no telling yet how intense Sepat will get. Currently the storm has maximum sustained winds of about 150 miles per hour, according to the Joint Typhoon Warning Center. The only pressure estimate I've seen currently gives 916.5 millibars. But the storm is expected to intensify further; and in light of Emanuel's theory, certainly seems to have some serious potential to become considerably more powerful than it currently is...not just a weak Category 5, but a very strong one.

Comments

Does he have any discussion about the large black areas near the equator? I think tropical cyclones are supposed to be relatively rare in these very low lattitudes?

Posted by: bigTom | August 15, 2007 10:15 AM

Not exactly sure...The storms can't form at the equator or in the region immediately on either side of it, though they can apparently come pretty close. Obviously the greatest concentration of ocean heat though is likely to be close to the equator as that's what gets the most sun.

Posted by: Chris Mooney | August 15, 2007 12:39 PM

bigTom:
See the wikipedia article on the Coriolis Effect , particularly the Coriolis in meteorology section.

The strength of the Coriolis effect approaches zero as one nears the equator. As a result, tropical cyclones very near the equator must rely on unusual weather conditions to provide sufficient spin. As a result, it is very difficult for tropical cyclones to form or intensify nearer to the equator than about 8 degrees. Agni and Vamei are notable for forming closest and second closest (respectively) to the equator.

Posted by: llewelly | August 15, 2007 3:04 PM

llewelly: I am aware that the coriolis effect will be proportional to the latitude (ignoring 2nd order..), but once some circulation gets started wouldn't it run its course (even if the spin is in the wrong direction). Or is it that the vorticity is being lost to frictional effects, and the incoming air has just to little of it to replenish the loses?

Posted by: bigTom | August 15, 2007 6:37 PM

Well, in the case of Agni and Vamei, the circulation did 'run its course' once it got started. And in Agni's case, part of the circulation was south of the equator for part of the storm's life. I don't know to what extent their nearness to the equator hampered them.

Posted by: llewelly | August 15, 2007 10:52 PM

Folks, a reference on this that may be hard to find:
Old Farmer's Almanac, "A Spicy Account of (Quite Possibly) the Worst Day in Weather History," (2003): 132-37. By James Rodger Fleming.

Posted by: Chris Mooney | August 15, 2007 11:31 PM

None of this, of course, explains what the black areas near the equator are on the maximum potential intensity map. I wouldn't call Kerry Emanuel up to trouble him about this, but it's certainly interesting. As far as I can see the MPI equation does not contain an "f" term, which means Coriolis Effect. Maybe it's just assumed that though there's great heat potential at the equator the storms aren't gonna go there.

Posted by: Chris Mooney | August 16, 2007 8:40 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs