Seed Media Group

Your Bloggers

sidebar3.jpg Chris Mooney is a freelance writer and the author of two books, The Republican War on Science and Storm World. For more information see his bio, events, articles, or visit him on Wikipedia and YouTube.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is a marine biologist at Duke University. Sometimes she's a classicist, radio jock, or congressional staffer. Never sure what's next, she continues to enjoy the journey...

Chris & Sheril have a sound track and are currently working on ScienceDebate2008, which they just described in:

ScienceApril11.gif


Chris's Books

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Nature Blog Network

Archives

Search this blog

Subscribe via Email

Stay abreast of your favorite bloggers' latest and greatest via e-mail, via a daily digest.

Sign me up!

« One Reason I Do What I Do | Main | The Commodity Speculation Bubble »

Advocating Science Diplomacy

Category: Women In PoliticsWomen in Science
Posted on: August 19, 2008 11:40 AM, by Sheril R. Kirshenbaum

The NYTimes Claudia Dreifus recently interviewed Dr. Nina V. Fedoroff, science adviser to the secretary of state and administrator of the Agency for International Development:

Q. WHY DOES THE SECRETARY OF STATE NEED A SCIENCE ADVISER?

A. Because science and technology are the drivers of the 21st century's most successful economies.

There are more than six billion of us, and the problems of a crowded planet are everyone's: food, water, energy, climate change, environmental degradation. Other nations, even those that have lost respect for our culture and politics, still welcome collaboration on scientific and technological issues.

Science deserves higher priority than it receives in today's politics. Our presidential candidates have not discussed their positions on critical science policy decisions or participated in a debate called for by nearly the entire scientific establishment. Clearly this is evidence that more of us like Nina must stand up and demonstrate why these issues are intimately connected to our national security, our health, economy, and global future.

It's up to us to convince policymakers that science matters... or we all lose.

scientist%20congress%20ucs.jpg

Comments

Alas, instead of the science debate, we just keep getting more religious debates trying to determine which is the more "Jesusier" candidate.

You say we "must stand up and demonstrate why these issues are intimately connected to our national security, our health, economy, and global future," but is writing blog posts effectively standing up?

It's up to us to convince policymakers that science matters... or we all lose.

Hey, for me to even try to do that would be pointless. Those guys aren't reading my blog and I'm only another voice drowned out by millions of fundies wanting to know how the candidates feel about Jesus.

Posted by: Norman Doering | August 19, 2008 5:50 PM

I am surprised by the 'tepid' (almost none) discussion of Fedoroff's interview in the Scienceblogs. Nina's comments about technology and hunger are outrageous to say the least.

Posted by: linoos | August 25, 2008 5:04 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Imagine 130,000 breasts bobbing in the sea 12.04.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. CNN screws the pooch 12.04.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Wind-Powered Perpetual Motion 12.03.2008 · Mark C. Chu-Carroll
  4. Praying for Economic Recovery 12.04.2008 · Ed Brayton
  5. Was Nazi science good science? 12.04.2008 · Orac

Search All Blogs