Now on ScienceBlogs: Open Lab PSA

Seed Media Group

Your Bloggers

sidebar3.jpg Chris Mooney is a visiting associate in the Center for Collaborative History at Princeton University and the author of three books, The Republican War on Science, Storm World, and Unscientific America.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is a marine biologist and author at Duke University. Sometimes she's a classicist, radio jock, or congressional staffer. Never sure what's next, she continues to enjoy the journey. For more information, visit her website.

Our Forthcoming Book

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Nature Blog Network

Archives

Search

« 61 Nobel Laureates | Main | I Want To Debate Sarah Palin »

Our Energy Future

Category: Energy
Posted on: September 28, 2008 11:15 AM, by Sheril R. Kirshenbaum

naturecover.pngOn September 25th, Nature magazine published 'Choosing A Future,' telling us more about where each presidential candidate stands on science related topics. And despite the humorous and uncanny similarities of the front and back covers, this is a very serious issue because it outlines some differences in their strategies. Not surprisingly, of particular interest to me are their positions on oil drilling which I've posted over at NexGen.

The gist:
Obama: Don't expand domestic drilling and reduce dependence on oil altogether.
McCain: Drill Baby Drill! and expand offshore-drilling.

The full rundown from both candidates on America's energy future is available here from the team at ScienceDebate2008.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/82245

Comments

1

Well, it appears to be no surprise as to whom you'll be voting for this November. However, McCain's position is a far bit more than just drilling for more oil.

Perhaps until the election is over, this site should be renamed: Politic Blogs, though Obama Blogs is probably more appropriate.

Posted by: TomJoe | September 29, 2008 9:05 AM

2

Judging from the debate, Obama supports far more drilling, in part I suspect because the idea seems also to have popular support. He did a poor job explaining why more drilling will have a negligible impact.

From a climate standpoint, additional drilling has virtually no impact.

However, energy independence is a fairy tale, and will not be achieved. It is possible that the coming energy crisis may have been averted in the short term if serious mitigation had started in the 1970s. That point is far in the past.

In my opinion, the most likely scenario is that energy from all sources will become an increasingly scarce commodity. That will be serious indeed. It will make the current financial crisis seems like a pleasant stroll in the park.

Posted by: Eric the Leaf | September 29, 2008 10:32 AM

3

Eric: I disagree with your opinion. I think we need to follow not only the path to energy independence, but the path of energy conservation. We need to do everything we can to cut down on vampiric energy usage (which accounts for ~10% of our energy expenditures annually), and we need to work on efficient renewable energy. Those two things, I believe, can play a large part in helping us achieve energy independence, and providing us with enough energy to sustain a global economy.

Posted by: TomJoe | September 29, 2008 11:05 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM