Now on ScienceBlogs: The Future - And Present - of Maternal and Infant Health Care.

ScienceBlogs Book Club: Inside the Outbreaks

Your Bloggers

sidebar3.jpg Chris Mooney is a visiting associate in the Center for Collaborative History at Princeton University and the author of three books, The Republican War on Science, Storm World, and Unscientific America.

Sheril Kirshenbaum is a marine biologist and author at Duke University. Sometimes she's a classicist, radio jock, or congressional staffer. Never sure what's next, she continues to enjoy the journey. For more information, visit her website.

Our Forthcoming Book

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Blogroll

Nature Blog Network

Archives

Search

« While Exploring The Cosmos, A Look Back At Earth | Main | The Science Behind Why Chimpanzees Are Not Pets »

The "Holds" Scandal Worsens: Speak Out!

Category: EnergyGlobal WarmingPoliticsPolitics and Science
Posted on: March 4, 2009 9:56 AM, by Chris C. Mooney

Mike Dunford has the details, based on Congressional Quarterly's reporting. There are apparently multiple senators blocking two of Obama's key science appointees from taking their posts. This is outrageous--a totally new kind of "war on science"--and we need a full court press. Details here.

Share on Facebook
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Facebook
Find more posts in: PoliticsEnvironment

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/101196

Comments

1

What are the reasons for the holds on the two science advisor nominees?

Posted by: LINDA HH CAMPBELL | March 4, 2009 2:15 PM

2

Looks like Senator Menendez is putting his own ideology ahead of what's best for the country and his own party (again).

He played a crass political game to put a hold on scientific advisers and now he's playing the same game on the Omnibus spending bill.

Menendez is looking more like NJ's very own version of Joe Lieberman every day.

"The most stinging defection: Reid’s own senatorial campaign committee chairman, Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J), who told Democratic leaders that he’d be voting “no” over his objections to the House bill’s easing of the embargo against Cuba."
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19771.html

Posted by: Dark Tent | March 9, 2009 11:30 AM

ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter

© 2006-2011 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.