Before the recent bartered spouse kerfuffle here at ScienceBlogs, I had a particular topic I wanted to write about. Here it goes, lovely chickens.
You see, Isis the Scientist is just that -- a real life scientist. I come with all the accessories. I have a lab coat, safety glasses, a cool notebook, and 2-3 Sharpies in my pocket at any given time. I also have some data. I am, basically, amazing. And also very humble.
Figure 1: I mean, sure Dr. Isis's labcoat is Baby Phat, but whatevs. Lab couture is pretty hot.
I really love the idea of the Citizen Scientist movement and teaching science to the huddled masses, thirsting for knowledge. I like to keep tabs on people like ScienceGoddess Joanne Manaster. That woman cracks me up and her videos are amazing. So much so, that I don't smite her over the whole "goddess" thing. I mean, have you seen her silk/acrylic earrings in her recent video?
But, I digress. Hot earrings will do that to me.
I love the idea of Citizen Science, but I also know that, to use wording from a recent grant application, there are particular things that I am "uniquely qualified" to do and I am not sure that I am on board with the idea that the interwebs or general public will ever completely replace classically trained bench scientists. I love keeping my blog, but I know that my job first and foremost is to be a totally hot and promising young investigator.
That's why my ears (er, eyes?) perk up whenever I see an article or blog post about how blogging can impact one's career as a scientist.
Figure 2: Godfather Coturnix. If you screw with that guy, he'll put a horse head in your print journal
So, you can bet that when I saw that title, I clicked through faster than you can say "Sephora."
Here's what Alex has to say about blogging and his career...
First is the nakedness of blogging. I'm the only person keeping me from looking like an idiot in public. There's no editor to purge any of my flat-earthisms before I click "publish". So if I'm horribly, terribly mistaken on some obvious point, if I routinely misspell some common latin name, well, there it is for all to see. It's far easier to be seen as a moron as a blogger than it is as a carefully vetted publishing scientist.
Second, the fact that my posts aren't reviewed provides a ready excuse to dismiss any legitimate criticisms I might have about a particular bit of work. For example, A few weeks ago I published a criticism of a rather large study of ant macroecology. Authors of that paper- rather than address my argument, can if they like point to the fact that this is an unreviewed blog and ignore it. In fact, I was privy to some behind-the-scenes emails about the post, and that's exactly what happened. Had I published my critique in a technical journal it'd carry much more weight.
...
I am not trying to avoid accountability by ducking the review system. It's that the blog is an outlet for short snippets that I'd not have tried to publish previously. Does exercising this new niche damage my academic credibility? I don't really know. Scientific blogging is an emerging media without established norms.
Whew! Dr. Isis and her career are totes safe on this one, little muffins.
You see, I understand Alex's concerns about how blogging about studies and scientific findings could damage your reputation. It's very easy to get all hot-headed and lay the smack down (trust me, I know), ripe with misspellings and all. But, if you offer commentary on your blog with the same degree of scrutiny and rigor you would at a meeting or in conversation with your colleagues, supported by the available data at hand, then you should feel as confident in the things you write and you do the things you say in public.
Alex does allude to a couple of very valid and important points that those of us who put on our capes and play science blogger in our spare time have to remember.
- A blog post is not a scientific publication.
- It doesn't count if you publish your data in a blog post.
- Your blog usually doesn't generate novel data
- Don't let your blog make you take your eye off the prize.
Is it right? Doesn't matter. It's reality.
That's the part of blogging that I sometimes have to remind myself of. When I first told a more senior colleague what I was up to, he told me, "Isis, I don't care if you are building model trains in your spare time and then blowing them up. Just keep the data coming." That is the metric by which we are judged. But, keeping the data coming can be tedious and sitting to hammer out a grant application, book chapter, or article can feel endless. I can throw out a blog post, by comparison, in a minimal amount of time and feel like i have accomplished something. And I have to you and to me, as long as I don't take my eye off the prize.
What am I getting at? I suppose I am getting at the way I am feeling about blogging lately. There are a million things I want to accomplish here and my blog idea notebook is getting fuller by the day, but I have to be a scientist first. That means I probably won't be the ScienceBlogger who breaks all the headlines or posts six unique posts each day. It also means that I frequently feel guilty for not moving the blog content along fast enough. I'm not finished my contributions to Silence is the Enemy. I still owe you my letter to the ambassador and I have one more SitE-related activity for you. I still have another round of letters to send out for the Letters to Our Daughters Project. I have more hilarious Photoshops backing up than I can shake my magic wand tool at and at one point I promised to write more about Egypt. It's still in there. I still promise.
On the other hand, I have had a book contribution, data, students, two articles, abstracts, and two seminar presentations waiting for me here and those are the metrics by which I am judged. So, while I have wanted to sit and finish my SitE contribution before the end of June, I have to be realistic and know that my book deadline is more pressing. My blog has to happen on Isis Standard Time, meaning that it gets everything I have left at the end of the day after my role as scientist is finished being played and sometimes I am going to be a day behind in the blogosphere and projects may take longer than I'd like.
But, what's a breathtaking young scientist to do? I'll tell you.
Get herself some damned tenure so that she can blog more.




Comments
I understand, Goddess. This is why my own posts arrive at irregular intervals, and not on a daily basis. I must admit that becoming a full time media diva would be attractive if I could find someone to pay me for it.
Given the current state of funding, I may have a lot of time to blog in the near future.
Posted by: Pascale | July 6, 2009 11:03 PM
The pressure you're feeling really isn't unique to science - I too have similar feelings about being behind on the blog with drafts and piles of things to write about, but the day job has to take priority (and the boyfriend needs time too, or so he claims). The problem is, scientists or policy people or whatever, we're not full-time journalists or writers, so for us, blogging is never going to map squarely onto our career to-do list.
Posted by: bioephemera | July 6, 2009 11:08 PM
dissertation >>> blog, that's for sure.
but reading other people's blogs makes for a good sanity break during a 14 hour (and counting) day.
Posted by: leigh | July 6, 2009 11:15 PM
We bloggerz are supposed to wear capes? I've been just wearing goggles, socks and a fancy hat. I suppose I can add a cape, too.
The potential negative impact of blogging on my future and present career has weighed heavily upon me. It's something I frequently think about as a tap away at my keyboard, because I don't want to present some awesome hot data at a conference and have the blog-literati in the audience only remember me because they recognize me for a silly post. I simply wish to be taken seriously, and unfortunately most of the greybeards in science don't see public outreach as a serious or worthwhile goal. Kinda makes me want to deliver a data talk in the form of a power ballad, though.
Posted by: Toaster | July 6, 2009 11:16 PM
Love your last comment about tenure. :)
Posted by: Academic | July 6, 2009 11:37 PM
thanks Isis.
but sometimes I dream of a science career where I can blog and do outreach fulltime and get paid well for it. I dream.
Posted by: DNLee | July 7, 2009 12:10 AM
Oh Isis, everyone knows that blogging comes way way after scientist which comes after little Isis (or maybe science is equal to LI or when demon that lives inside 2 year old boys comes out, you prefer the science , at least I do)....anyways blogging should be fun. Which is why you won't see many post from me...
Posted by: ScientistMother | July 7, 2009 12:51 AM
Tenure will give you more time to blog??? Really????
No, I don't think you will be a different Isis with tenure. Remember the saying 'if you have something urgent to be done, give the job to a BUSY person.'
Keep science-ing, yes that is the most important contribution you can make - the rest will happen.
Posted by: d. | July 7, 2009 8:47 AM
What the fucking fuck is up with Bora in that suit-and-tie getup!?!?!?
Posted by: Comrade PhysioProf | July 7, 2009 10:44 AM
I hear you on this one, sister. Whenever I start thinking that my job is interfering with my blogging, I remind myself that it must be the other way around or I'll lose not just my income, but also my source material.
Posted by: ScienceWoman | July 7, 2009 11:47 AM
I am a new reader to your blog. Well, I've read it randomly before and now am trying to read more regularly. I understand that a blogger would want to provide regular material to their readership, and you do have quite a readership. However, I don't think you should feel guilty for letting your real life, your important life of personal relationships and getting work done come first before your blog, fun and relaxing though it may be. Isn't that why us female scientists and mothers read your blog? So we can see how this crazy juggling is done?
Says the grad student whose advisor just emailed asking about progress on calculations that should have already been done for a poster that is supposed to be presented this month.
Thanks for providing such a wonderful blog. I look forward to all the posts.
Posted by: Balancing Act | July 7, 2009 1:16 PM
Wonderful post!
I'm actually concerned, however, that people actually WOULD actually count a review they posted on their blog in their scientific repertoire.
Posted by: Science Bear | July 7, 2009 1:56 PM
CPP: My guess is the coat and tie were probably photo-shopped, like the throne. Put him on a toilet. He shits diamonds wrapped in gold. His hotness is beyond && !!infinity!! Way hotter than ten thousand suns. Nobody can touch him! Not even close.
Posted by: Catharine | July 7, 2009 3:32 PM
Re: The comment about tenure.
Are you advertising your intent to blow off work as soon as you get tenure?
You're not going to get tenure if higher-ups think it's a ticket to becoming a full-time blogger. That's not what you were hired for.
Posted by: SImulacrum | July 7, 2009 3:41 PM
I'm another new reader of your blog, and I'm impressed that you are able to write as much as you do with your other responsibilities. Like everyone else says, obviously your actual job and family have to take priority. Any reasonable person understands this.
Posted by: Paul | July 7, 2009 5:30 PM
Slmulacrum, you'll be much happier if you go read some other blog, methinks! You seem much too serious for the fun in this one.
Posted by: Mimi | July 7, 2009 6:41 PM
Have any of you assistant professor types thought about getting an outreach grant for X% salary support for blogging?
I don't know what the biological equivalent of a NASA space grant is, but then you have another pile of $$ to put on your tenure review stack. And you get paid to blog.
Posted by: Lab Lemming | July 8, 2009 7:44 AM