Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« The 0.1 % solution | Main | Barack Obama tackles the secular-faithful divide »

Killing the messenger

Category: climate
Posted on: June 28, 2006 12:45 PM, by James Hrynyshyn

One more time, with gusto: "There's a debate over whether it's manmade or naturally caused." So said Bush Jr. the other day. As Chris "Intersection" Mooney, noted, the only "debate" over the causes of climate change is taking place in Bush's mind. Meanwhile, however, there are very real consequences to the way the science of climate change is being conducted. Word just came down that

"the National Climatic Data Center in Asheville [NC] would face cuts in services and layoffs under a budget proposal headed for a vote in the U.S. House of Representatives, officials with the center warn.

You probably haven't heard of the National Climatic Data Center. It's not as high-profile as the Colorado gang, or the Hadley group in the U.K. And not a lot of original research goes on there.

But the NCDC is "the world's largest collection of climate data and information, which often is used for monitoring long-term trends that might harm lives and property and the nation's environmental, national, homeland and economic security."

They just had to include a reference to homeland security, didn't they? I know. Politics. But now it looks like even that craven description isn't doing the trick. According to the Asheville Citizen Times, from where that description comes:

A House budget proposal gives the data center $13.3 million, which is $3.9 million less than was requested and $1.2 million less than its budget from the previous fiscal year.

Without changes, the center would be forced to lay off some of its 100 contract scientists and workers and limit hours in which they can help 50,000 clients with questions, said Tom Karl, the center's director.

It's biggest client is its boss, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Call me crazy, but slashing a budget is no way to settle a debate. Even an imaginary one.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

This would be a terrible idea, but consistent with the current policies of crippling truly useful organizations within the government.

Posted by: Mark Paris | June 28, 2006 3:59 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most German

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com