Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« Bill Bryson and Bill O'Reilly | Main | PSYCH Colombia: Voodoo-doll exorcisms »

In praise of ignorance

Category: science culture
Posted on: September 19, 2006 11:48 AM, by James Hrynyshyn

Former Boston Globe science columnist and college prof. Chet Raymo has written a stirring ode to the value of ignorance in his latest Science Musings. Pascal, Priestly and Popper -- he covers them all. What he's done is put his finger on a counter-intuitive definition of science, and what a definition it is:

The purpose of science -- and indeed all education -- is to arrive at a state of ignorance, but an ignorance that is aware of itself.
One more excerpt should be enough to convince you to read the whole thing.
As long as our answers to these questions invoked the gods -- as they did for thousands of years -- no reliable public knowledge was possible. Only when a few curious people said "I don't know" did science begin. Admission of ignorance is a prerequisite of scientific discovery, and by the same token, the more we learn, the more we are aware of what we do not know.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

I'm glad you've picked up on Raymo's piece. To extend or build on his clear headed view of science, I'd add that ignorance manifests itself in the form of questions. The point of the knowledge enterprise is to equip us to ask ever more pointed questions. What's special about modern science is that it cultivates the art of framing questions in a way that permits experience and experiment to contribute to the answers.

Posted by: bob koepp | September 19, 2006 1:28 PM

"The purpose of science -- and indeed all education -- is to arrive at a state of ignorance, but an ignorance that is aware of itself."

That statement just makes me feel stupid not ignorant: I wish I would have said it. Now I have to go read the whole thing. Thanks.

Posted by: dogscratcher | September 19, 2006 4:20 PM

Just got back: good read, sounds more philosophical than scientific, but nothing wrong with that.

Posted by: dogscratcher | September 19, 2006 10:28 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Priorities 07.23.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. Evolution happens 07.23.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Books, Books, Books 07.23.2008 · Chad Orzel
  4. Mt. Improbable? 07.23.2008 · Jason Rosenhouse
  5. Idiot of the Century? 07.23.2008 · Ed Brayton

Top Science Stories

powered by SEED - seedmagazine.com