Here's what George W. Bush had to say about climate change in his penultimate state of the union address: "...and they will help us to confront the serious challenge of global climate change." That's it. A parathetical afterthought for the most pressing issue of modern times. I suppose we should be happy that even that much made it through the editing process. Oh well.
The Island of Doubt
An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other. Mostly regarding climate change, though.
Profile
James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.
Search
Recent Posts
- Climate Cover-Up
- Bjorn Lomborg launches campaign against logic
- The link between the climate denial and anti-vaccine crowds
- Climate control in Canada: And now the good news
- Another nail in the Superfreakonomics coffin
- Is 350 the right target for atmospheric CO2?
- Explaining plummeting belief in anthropogenic climate change
- Science is not a religion
- Limbaugh listeners need to do some soul-searching
- Superfreakonomics: How did they get climate change so wrong?
Recent Comments
- Marco on The link between the climate denial and anti-vaccine crowds
- konya chat on Global warming mountains and molehills
- konya chat on Does what George Will thinks about climate change really matter?
- infants on The radical "trillionth ton" meme
- infants on Newsflash: You can't trust the fossil fuel industry
- konya chat on McCain on climate and energy
- konya chat on McCain on climate and energy
- Alec on Bjorn Lomborg launches campaign against logic
- Eric L on The link between the climate denial and anti-vaccine crowds
- konya chat on Fact-checking? We don't need no stinkin' fact-checking!
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Other Doubtful Blogs
- Panda's Thumb
- Real Climate
- George Monbiot
- Chet Raymo
- Ben Goldacre
- James Annan
- John Fleck
- Kristine Harley
- DeSmogBlog
- Climate Progress
- Jennifer Oullette
Inspiration
The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark,
by Carl Sagan
(A
review)
The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)
Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com
Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org
A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The
Place
Where We Are Right
The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt
Author's site: cyamid.net
--- H. L. Mencken
By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard
Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins
As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.
"There is no need to sally forth, for it remains true that those things
which make us human are, curiously enough, always close at hand.
Resolve, then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving, and
tiny blasts of tinny trumpets, we have met the enemy, and not only may
he be ours, he may be us."
--Walt Kelly
« Very superstitious | Main | How scared do we need to be? »
SOTU: Short shrift for climate change
Posted on: January 24, 2007 7:05 AM, by James Hrynyshyn
Share this: Facebook Twitter Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/31391
Comments
Hey,
At least he finally mentioned it, for the first time. Imagine if he had to deal with a Democratic majority throughout his entire Presidency?
There are stories that after his election, he was really planning on being a "uniter" until Rove looked at the polls and realized there was no political upside to it.
Maybe he is reverting. Too little, too late.
Posted by: Robert P. | January 24, 2007 11:07 AM
Wondering how Bush can get away with continuing to side-step and downplay the climate issue? It's because his base among *college-educated* Republicans continues to refute the science and urgency of global warming. See this post on the details and why college-educated Republicans remain more skeptical than their high-school counterparts.
http://scienceblogs.com/framing-science/2007/01/in_latest_survey_only_23_of_co.php
Posted by: Matthew C. Nisbet | January 24, 2007 7:10 PM
Well he may have mentioned it, but his plans take as much as give. A big chunck of the proposed alternative fuels is coal to diesel. That would add about as much CO2, as the quite modest bump in CAFE saves. The rest is same-old same-old, talk of technology doing the job, but no substantial funding -or economic incentives for research/deployment. Looks just like Iraq, kick the can down the road for another two years.
I was surpised (dismayed) to hear foreign reaction -they seemed to think his position had actually changed.
Posted by: big | January 24, 2007 11:09 PM
"Republicans continues to refute"
Actually, they _dis_pute. It is not possible to refute either the science or the urgency.
Posted by: Greg | January 25, 2007 11:12 PM