Official Comment Count: 1,032,495

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« Oh those poor whales | Main | Repeat after me: "There is no such thing as clean coal" »

A special place in hell

Category: evolution
Posted on: May 27, 2007 1:09 PM, by James Hrynyshyn

If hell was real, a place of honor would be reserved for Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who blocked a plan to honor Rachel Carson last week. We named our cat after Carson, so you can guess how angry this makes me.

From a Reuters report a couple of days ago"

"Rachel Carson's work both directly and indirectly created a climate of hysteria and misinformation about the impact of DDT on the human populations," said John Hart, a spokesman for Coburn, in explaining why the Oklahoma Republican withheld his support for the plan to honor her.

"Obviously her central claim about what it does to ecosystems was largely correct," Hart said by telephone. "But her approach was consistent with a lot of environmental rhetoric which tends to sensationalize the facts."

Rhetoric. Right.

For those who aren't intimately familiar with Carson's legacy, she practically jump-started the environmental movement with Silent Spring in 1962, setting in motion a shift in the zeitgeist that led directly to the US Clean Air and Clean Water acts. Ten years before that, her book The Sea Around Us changed the way humans related to the oceans, and, among other things, a few decades later inspired the creation of The Sea Around Us Project at the University of British Columbia's Fisheries Centre, a group that has pioneered modern analysis of ocean ecosystems.

For the US Senate, honoring Carson should have been a no-brainer. Fortunately, not everyone is as feeble-minded as Coburn, who seems to have bought into the nonsensical propaganda that DDT really isn't all that dangerous.

The New Yorker, the magazine that published the articles later collected as Silent Spring, has a wonderful tribute here.

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

That's one book I grabbed still-warm from the binder & glad she got the royalty. That "rhetoric" provided a platform for consilient observations everywhere. It appears that "conservative" simply means "resistant to change" or a denial that there is anything new. Or perhaps they are confident that they already know everything and evidence to the contrary is dismissed as "hysteria".

Posted by: Skeptic8 | May 28, 2007 12:08 AM

For the US Senate, honoring Carson should have been a no-brainer.

Translation: USAian senators have no brains.

Posted by: blf | May 28, 2007 4:39 PM

bif, that's just not true!
Our august Senators have brains that are supported by the cash-drawer at the level of their belly-buttons. Just push one with polish & pelf in hand & see what you get.

Posted by: Skeptic8 | May 28, 2007 11:30 PM

I dont think he would go to hell for that.

Plus Coburn is awesome. Hes the one who challenged the bridge to nowhere and countless other wasteful projects.

Posted by: Chris | May 28, 2007 11:58 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting?

Search All Blogs

Blogs in the Network

Top Five: Readers' Picks