Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« Warm winds for Europe | Main | Everything you ever wanted to know about climate change but didn't know whom to ask »

The passing of an enemy of science

Category: punditry
Posted on: May 16, 2007 8:57 AM, by James Hrynyshyn

Pity the poor rationalist, who won't have Jerry Falwell to kick around any more. Gone is one of the leading opponents of reasoned debate, a man who seemed to devote every waking hour to turning the clock back on the Enlightenment. I have no idea how good a family man he was, but his public persona was one of open hostility to tolerance, diversity and science. Just how significant he was -- and therefore how significant is his death -- is far from clear, but I suspect that this morning's eulogies greatly exaggerate his lasting influence.

What's consuming the nation's obituarists today is the memory of a prominent Baptist who once blamed the 9/11 attacks on "the pagans and the abortionists and the feminists and the gays and the lesbians" and explicitly connected Hurricane Katrina to those who would defend a women's right to an abortion. He also called the entire idea of climate change "a tool of Satan being used to distract churches from their primary focus" and claimed to understand the science as well as leading global warming campaigners.

Spouting such nonsense as was his habit, it's no wonder that the consensus seems to be that Falwell was a marginal figure for at least the last 20 years, attracting media attention (other that Larry King spots) only when he said something silly. Which was a fair bit.

But there's a large disagreement over his political influence back in the late 1970s and early 80s, as founder of the fundamentally anti-science Moral Majority. Today on NPR's Morning Edition, reporter Barbara Bradley Hagerty used the term "juggernaut" to describe his influence on the 1980 election, claiming he brought millions of fundamentalist Christians. She supplied no evidence for that claim, however. And in Newsweek, Jonathan Alter makes a good stab at demolishing that idea, pointing out that polls show Falwell's abortion focus was nowhere near as importeant as economics and foreign policy when it came to voting against Carter. Falwell, writes Alter, "was not even close to being instrumental" in Reagan's victory.

The myth of Falwell's importance persists, however, and there's a perfect example on You Tube, in which MSNBC is caught mistaking a White House parody site (whitehouse.org), which sings the praises of Falwell, for the real White House website, which does no such thing (and also doesn't carry ads encouraging viewers to "Flatter Jesus or he'll torture you in hell").

I'd say Falwell's political legacy is important in the same way Bo Derek's hair in "10" was important. For those without an independent thought in their heads, that is.

Comments

There's a spoof.com bit on Jerry. For most people, it would be a pretty harsh eulogy. But Jerry can defend himself on this one.

http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s3i18854

Posted by: Stephen | May 16, 2007 2:52 PM

And the winning eulogy is this one, aired on CNN.

http://newsbloggers.aol.com/2007/05/16/christopher-hitchens-mourns-jerry-falwell-in-his-own-way/

Too bad Chris pulls his punches so much.

Posted by: Stephen | May 18, 2007 2:42 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs