Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« The problem with economics | Main | Gray whales doing worse than we thought »

Requiem for the polar bear

Category: ecology
Posted on: September 10, 2007 7:59 AM, by James Hrynyshyn

Well, for what it's worth, the U.S. Geological Survey has confirmed what just about every independent observer of the polar bear has been saying for years: time's running out. According to the executive summary of the service's initial findings as part of its investigation into whether to add Ursus maritimus to the Endangered Species list, the Alaskan population has as little as 45 years left until extirpation. The other North American populations could stick around a bit longer, but when the habitat is on the way out, things are pretty grim all over. To wit (emphasis mine):

Projected changes in future sea ice conditions, if realized, will result in loss of approximately 2/3 of the world's current polar bear population by the mid 21st century. Because the observed trajectory of Arctic sea ice decline appears to be underestimated by currently available models, this assessment of future polar bear status may be conservative.

Specifically,

12. Ultimately, we projected a 42% loss of optimal polar bear habitat during summer in the polar basin by mid century.

14. Using a simple deterministic model of future carrying capacity for polar bears, we forecasted that polar bears could be extirpated in the divergent ice ecoregion [north coast of Alaska and the Western Arctic coast in Canada] within 75 years, assuming that sea ice decline follows the mean trajectory predicted by the 10 models we used. If sea ice decline follows the minimum trajectory predicted, extirpation in this ecoregion could occur by year 45.

15. Using the carrying capacity model, we projected populations of polar bears in all other ecoregions to decline at all time steps, with severity of decline dependent upon whether minimum, maximum or mean ice projections were used. The only exception was a slight, temporary, increase in the polar basin convergent ice [Baffin Bay, I think] ecoregion for the 45 year timestep and the maximum ice scenario.

16. Based on a first-generation Bayesian Network model* incorporating a range of factors affecting polar bears, we forecasted extirpation of polar bear populations in the seasonal sea ice [Hudson Bay] and the polar basin divergent ecoregions by 45 years from present.

17. We forecasted extirpation of polar bear populations in the polar basin convergent ecoregion by 75 years from present. In the archipelagic ecoregion [Canadian islands], polar bears could occur through the end of the century, but in smaller numbers than now.

Of course, all of this is pretty much moot. Even if the polar bear is listed on the ESA list, all that means is the USF&WS would then be required to come up with a recovery plan. And since the cause of the problem is disappearing habitat due to climate change, it seems unlikely that even the service's best scientists will be able to find a politically viable solution to a problem that has flummoxed everyone else.

Note that the projections are based on a "business as usual" emissions scenario. In other cases that might be too pessimistic. After all, it is conceivable we will begin to reduce emissions at least somewhat in the next few decades. But unfortunately for the polar bear, the polar ice cap will almost certainly continue to melt regardless of what we do with our factories and automobiles, at least in the time frames involved.

Note also that while the 45-year extirpation prediction depends on a minimum ice coverage, the report concludes that their estimates may be conservative, because the current models do not take into account recent data showing record summer ice reduction. Predictions as to when we'll see an ice-free summer in the Arctic range from 13 to 40 years.

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Readers' Picks

Search All Blogs