Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« The story of the Hurricane: Rethinking the climate change connection | Main | 16-year-old libels James Hansen »

Now this is interesting...

Category: climate
Posted on: April 14, 2008 1:19 PM, by James Hrynyshyn

For once, playing the role of unofficial in-house organ for the Republican Party is pays off in the scoop department. The Washington Times is reporting this morning George W. Bush is about to call for legislation that would do something about the country's greenhouse gas emissions. The story is short on details. All we really get is:

"This is an attempt to move the administration and the party closer to the center on global warming. With these steps, it is hoped that the debate over this is over, and it is time to do something," said an administration source close to the White House who is familiar with the planning and who said to expect an announcement this week.
"It is hoped that the debate is over." Understatement of the week. There's also this mealy-mouthed summary of the scientific view:
Many scientists say humans are contributing to climate change through increased carbon dioxide emissions from industry, power generation, automobiles and other sources.
But I guess that's about as good as it gets in The Washington Times.

Comments

Of course, "the debate" that they wish to be over is whether the Republicans are doing anything for the environment. They still think it's bunk, but figure this will quiet the criticism that they're out to lunch on the issue.

Posted by: Grant Canyon | April 14, 2008 3:36 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most Active

  1. Not my cup of tea 11.22.2008 · PZ Myers
  2. I wish this were a Poe 11.23.2008 · PZ Myers
  3. Quadrant's war on science 11.21.2008 · Tim Lambert
  4. Many-Worlds and Decoherence: There Are No Other Universes 11.20.2008 · Chad Orzel
  5. Oh. Canada. 11.22.2008 · Orac

Search All Blogs