Now on ScienceBlogs: Oxytocin: Starting with the basics

Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other. Mostly regarding climate change, though.

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Search

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

"There is no need to sally forth, for it remains true that those things which make us human are, curiously enough, always close at hand. Resolve, then, that on this very ground, with small flags waving, and tiny blasts of tinny trumpets, we have met the enemy, and not only may he be ours, he may be us."
--Walt Kelly

« Free Us. Now. | Main | Sarah Palin? »

Sen. Dole vs. the atheists

Category: religiosity
Posted on: August 28, 2008 3:29 PM, by James Hrynyshyn

As far as I can tell, North Carolina's no different from the rest of America when it comes to religion. About a tenth of the population is free of religious conviction. That's not a big slice, but it could, in theory, be big enough to cost Sen. Elizabeth Dole her re-election this November, if enough free-thinkers learn that they're not welcome at her dinner table. Thanks to PZ's outrage, we learn that Dole is outraged that her Democratic challenger, Kay Hagan, is hanging out with — horror of horrors — Boston atheists.

From Dole's website:

Salisbury, N.C. - On September 15th, Kay Hagan is heading to Boston, Massachusetts to attend a fundraiser for her Senate campaign. What may surprise mainstream North Carolinians is that the fundraiser will be in the home of leading anti religion activists Wendy Kaminer and her lawyer husband Woody Kaplan -- who is an advisor to the "Godless Americans Political Action Committee."

...

"Kay Hagan is trying to run a campaign in North Carolina that casts her as a moderate but the money that's paying for it is coming from the left-wing fringe of political thought," said Dole Campaign Communications Director Dan McLagan. "You can tell a lot about a person by their friends and these are friends most North Carolinians would not be comfortable having over for dinner."

I decided to call Dan McLagan and ask him if he meant to insult atheists on behalf of his boss.

"Elizabeth Dole respects all North Carolinians, but what we're saying is Kay Hagan is going to some interesting places to raise money," he replied, adding that Hagan also recently spent time in Chicago seeking money from unions.

I didn't ask how he knows which of his acquaintances are atheists. But I did wonder about Dole's approach to the scientific community, seeing as there are so many top-ranked researchers hanging around the Research Triangle, and given that about 93% of members of the National Academy of Sciences are atheists.

"There's no insult implied to the scientific community," was McLagan's response.

OK, then.

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/79889

Comments

1
"There's no insult implied to the scientific community," was McLagan's response.
I used to think NOMA was a smart, diplomatic, politically wise strategy. Now I see it contributed to a situation where most people are likely to accept statements like this, because they think there's no connection between being non-religious and being a scientist. And it contributes to discrimination against the majority of scientists, which contributes to undermining science.

Posted by: llewelly | August 28, 2008 5:05 PM

2

"... and these are friends most North Carolinians would not be comfortable having over for dinner."

And you sure wouldn't want one to go to your kids' school - or even to drink from the same water fountain!

Posted by: Pierce R. Butler | August 29, 2008 9:10 PM

3

thanks

Posted by: okey | May 30, 2009 5:29 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Follow ScienceBlogs on Twitter
Visit the Collective Imagination blog
Advertisement
Enter to win

© 2006-2009 Seed Media Group LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of Seed Media Group. All rights reserved.

Sites by Seed Media Group: Seed Media Group | ScienceBlogs | SEEDMAGAZINE.COM