An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.
James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.
Author's site: cyamid.netPenetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken
By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard
Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins
As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.
For the tail end of this year, I'd have to nominate this paper as the best way to introduce a global warming rookie, or anyone who considers themselves a skeptic of the consensus, to the state of the science,
I know of no solid evidence that editorial endorsements have even the slightest effect on presidential campaigns. You might be able to find some correlations in some states, but that could easily be because the newspaper and magazine editors are...
It's almost not worth the bother of taking another swipe at Sarah Palin's anti-intellectual bigotry this late in a game that's pretty much over, but gosh darn it, it's just too easy!
I just don't understand where the EPA is coming from when it assigns fuel economy ratings. The latest rankings are out and they just don't jibe with my driving experience. I'm not the most aggressive driver out there, but neither...
Two thirds of America's oil is used by the transportation sector. And since the transportation sector is not electrified, supplying more electricity in the form of nuclear generating plants won't actually end the need for that oil.
In a country that should be leading the charge toward clean energy thanks to its enormous natural and renewable resources, educated workforce and relatively healthy economy, we have another government that has consistently shown a preference for fossil fuels over renewables.
A look at some of the studies that have been by professionals and published in peer-reviewed journals confirms just how far from neutral we're talking about.
Science is science, and when it's raining, dark or you're thousands of kilometers from a coastline, it's hard to beat a couple of hours at a planetarium.
The Canadian Press has this story about Canadian scientists who have written an open letter calling on the Canadian voter to consider climate change in next week's federal election. When will their American colleagues follow suit?...
There are too many dilettantes out there, especially in the blogosphere, who will herald a paper that has been peer-reviewed, regardless of the quality of that review, as proof of one thing or another.
If I like what I see, I'll receive 5 more issues (6 in all) for just $14.95. That's 50% off the cover price! If I'm not completely satisfied, I'll simply write "cancel" on the invoice and owe nothing. The free issue is mine to keep.