Seed Media Group

The Island of Doubt

An irregular exploration of the struggle between the power of rational discourse and the scientific method on one hand, and the forces of superstition and dogma on the other.

Search this blog

Profile

me-fergus.jpg James Hrynyshyn is a freelance science journalist based in western North Carolina, where he tries to put degrees in marine biology and journalism to good use.

Recent Posts

   xml.gifrss.gif


Recent Comments

award1-blog.gif
for 9 July 2007

Archives

Other Doubtful Blogs

Inspiration

The Demon-Haunted World:
Science as a Candle
in the Dark, by Carl Sagan
(A review)

The Doubter's Companion:
by John Ralston Saul (Excerpts)

Skeptic Magazine: www.skeptic.com

Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal: www.csicop.org

A poem by Yehuda Amichai:
The Place
Where We Are Right


The Meaning of the
Island of Doubt


Author's site: cyamid.net


Add to Technorati Favorites! Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the unknowable. But there it sits nevertheless, calmly licking its chops.
--- H. L. Mencken

By doubting we come to inquiry; and through inquiry we perceive truth.
--- Peter Abelard

Undisguised clarity is easily mistaken for arrogance.
-- Richard Dawkins

As for evolution, it happened. Deal with it.
-- Michael Shermer.

More blogs about island of doubt.

« Why can't American scientists be like this? | Main | New York Times' nuclear oversight »

In praise of planetariums (and Laser Floyd)

Category: Sci-culture
Posted on: October 9, 2008 9:34 AM, by James Hrynyshyn

I was going to post a rant about John McCain's dishonest reference to Barack Obama's "overhead projector" earmark in Tuesday's presidential debate, but Joe Romm beat me to it. Again. So let me just say this about planetariums (planetaria?) instead:

The planetarium at the Manitoba Museum in Winnipeg played a key role in fostering my love of science. I can remember, when in my single-digit years, looking forward to the star theater each time we made the four-hour drive from the middle of northwestern Ontario to the big city. My parents would almost always take my brother and me to the planetarium, where we would wander through the black-lit exhibits on novae, gravity wells and galactic clusters. Then we would sit through whatever educational program was currently playing.

We learned all about the big bang, quasars, the exploration of the moon, possible end-of-universe scenarios and, of course, the constellations. And we loved every minute of it. I often left with a poster of some some cluster or another to hang in my bedroom.

By the time we were in our teens, we'd schedule our visits to ensure we saw a laser light show (Laser Floyd was my favorite), but we still spent a fair amount of time on the exhibits, which, while never seeming to change, never failed to fascinate. I still love planetariums and try to make sure I check one out when I visit a city so equipped, although I have to admit I'm over the light shows. (The one I forced my mother to sit through in London, England, when I was 15, involving a painfully loud version of Stairway to Heaven, put an end to that infatuation.)

When I finally got around to getting a degree in a science, I chose marine biology because it involved getting out on the water, an activity that trumps indoor virtual entertainment most days of the week. But science is science, and when it's raining, dark or you're thousands of kilometers from a coastline, it's hard to beat a couple of hours at a planetarium.

So $3 million for a computer-controlled planetarium projector? I wish it had been funded. We're talking about (I'm going to rant anyway) Chicago's Adler planetarium, folks. It's the oldest in the U.S. Surely it deserves an overhaul. Compare it to Winnipeg's

Zeiss Model Vs Star Projector. This precision opto-mechanical machine contains 154 projectors which work together to create an amazingly realistic night sky containing more than 9,000 stars, the Milky Way, the sun, moon and planets. The projector was manufactured in (the former) West Germany by the Carl Zeiss Optical Company of Oberkochen. It cost $125,000 Cdn in 1967. To replace the projector today would cost in excess of $2 million.

And I hope every American who's ever enjoyed a star theater show keeps that in mind when it comes to voting this year.

Comments

You betcha! I am votin' for That One, my friend.

Posted by: Elf Eye | October 9, 2008 12:09 PM

For McCain to say that a planetarium is "foolishness" a few months before the International Year of Astronomy (IYA2009) is harsh.

Posted by: metapsyche | October 9, 2008 3:10 PM

For McCain to say that a planetarium is "foolishness" a few months before the International Year of Astronomy (IYA2009) is harsh.

Posted by: metapsyche | October 9, 2008 3:15 PM

Obama Predicted GOP's Nasty Turn (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/10/obama-predicted-gops-nast_n_133562.html

McCain is actually using Obama's predictions since he cant think up one himself!

Posted by: paulm | October 10, 2008 1:16 PM

Shortly after the Manitoba Museum for Man and Nature opened up, our family would take the 90 minute drive north into Winnipeg at least twice a year for the museum and the planetarium, (sandwiching a trip to the Spaghetti Factory on Bannatyne.)

I remember one great show in which they speculated about the possibility of crossing into other universes through black holes. It was a fantastic experience each time. The show started with the blue sky darkening over a Winnipeg skyline, and we tried to guess which planets or stars would appear first (usually Betelguese.) We would have contests to see who could name the most constellations before the show started.

It's not a waste of spending to keep such equipment updated.

In the good news, Minneapolis' Library has now completed its fundraising drive to build a new planetarium!

Posted by: Mike Haubrich, FCD | October 11, 2008 8:05 AM

Many here think we can bet the climate change issue without reducing our consumption in the developed world. (ie material living standard). But NO we cant!

This recession come depression is a necessary path to addressing the issue and as climate environmentalist we should embrace it.

Posted by: paulm | October 13, 2008 8:53 AM

I'm sure it's all just a misunderstanding. McCain probably thought the earmark was for Planaria, not Planetaria, and he thinks $3 mil is too much for a flatworm.

Posted by: Trin Tragula | October 13, 2008 11:37 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. Comments are moderated for spam, your comment may not appear immediately. Thanks for waiting.)





Having problems commenting? (UPDATED)

Blogs in the Network

Advertisement

Top Five: Most German

Search All Blogs